Experience
Connaught Laboratories
SmithKline Beecham
Represented SmithKline Beecham in patent litigation regarding its Infanrix® pertussis component vaccine product.
Connaught Laboratories v. SmithKline Beecham, 3:97-cv-01406, M.D. Pa., Judge Kane
SmithKline Beecham
InterMetro Industries Corp. v. Howard Industries, Inc.
Howard Industries, Inc.
Bruce N. Saffran, M.D., Ph.D. v. Abbott Laboratories
Abbott Laboratories
Aesculap AG v. Walter Lorenz Surgical, Inc.
Walter Lorenz Surgical, Inc.
Ferring B.V. v. Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Ferring B.V.
Bridgestone Brands, LLC v. Balkrishna Indus., Ltd.
Bridgestone Brands, LLC
Electronic Receipts Delivery System, LLC v. Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
Fidelity National Information Services
Auth Token LLC v. Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz Inc.
Abbott Laboratories
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.