直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

ACTA Medical L.L.C. v. Curlin Medical Inc.

Curlin Medical Inc.

Moog, Inc.; Curlin Medical Inc.

Successfully defended an inter partes review challenging Curlin Medical’s innovative medical device technology. The petitioner requested adverse judgment before institution and the Board later terminated the case based on the parties’ settlement of their actions in several venues.

Curlin Medical Inc. v. Moog, Inc.; Curlin Medical Inc., IPR2017-00324, PTAB, Judges Bunting, Wieker, Worth

Related Professionals

Jason E. Stach
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6428
Email

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Industries

Life Sciences

Medical Device and Diagnostics

Related Experiences

Aerin Medical Inc. et al. v. Neurent Medical Inc. et al.

Aerin Medical Inc. et al.

Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. v. Radiometer Medical ApS

Radiometer Medical ApS

Certain Radiotherapy Systems & Treatment Planning Software; Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. Elekta AB

Elekta AB

Guidant Corp. v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.

Cardiac Pacemakers Inc.

Comprehensive patent services for medical equipment manufacturing company

Strategic alliance in medical diagnostics

Represented medical device company in patent infringement proceedings and nullity proceedings*

Represented U.S. company in patent infringement and nullity proceedings concerning medical devices*

Iridex Corp. v. Quantel Medical, SA

Quantel Medical, SA

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP