Experience
Curlin Medical Inc.
Moog, Inc.; Curlin Medical Inc.
Successfully defended an inter partes review challenging Curlin Medical’s innovative medical device technology. The petitioner requested adverse judgment before institution and the Board later terminated the case based on the parties’ settlement of their actions in several venues.
Curlin Medical Inc. v. Moog, Inc.; Curlin Medical Inc., IPR2017-00324, PTAB, Judges Bunting, Wieker, Worth
Aerin Medical Inc. et al. v. Neurent Medical Inc. et al.
Aerin Medical Inc. et al.
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. v. Radiometer Medical ApS
Radiometer Medical ApS
Guidant Corp. v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.
Cardiac Pacemakers Inc.
Iridex Corp. v. Quantel Medical, SA
Quantel Medical, SA
Syneron Medical Ltd. v. EndyMed Medical Ltd.
Syneron Medical Ltd.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.