Experience
accessiBe Ltd. v. AudioEye, Inc.
accessiBe Ltd.
AudioEye, Inc.
Finnegan represented accessiBe Ltd. in a high-stakes patent dispute against AudioEye, Inc., centered on web accessibility technologies. With AudioEye already asserting 15 patents across two pending lawsuits, accessiBe turned to Finnegan for a strategic counteroffensive.
Finnegan conducted a comprehensive market analysis, identified patents infringed by AudioEye, and acquired them on accessiBe’s behalf. Armed with this new IP arsenal, Finnegan filed a third lawsuit—this time putting accessiBe on the offensive in a jurisdiction known for faster trial timelines. This maneuver leapfrogged AudioEye’s earlier suits, placing accessiBe’s case at the front of the litigation queue.
Just weeks later, AudioEye came to the negotiating table. All three suits were resolved favorably for accessiBe, marking a decisive win driven by Finnegan’s proactive and tactical approach.
accessiBe Ltd. v. AudioEye, Inc., 1:22-cv-00792, D. Del., Judge Connolly
Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd. v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Hartig Drug Co. Inc. v. Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.
Senju Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd.
Amarin Pharms. Ireland Ltd. v. Omthera Pharms., Inc.
Omthera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. S3 Graphics Co., Ltd.
S3 Graphics Co., Ltd.
Housey Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.
Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. et al. v. Syngenta Seeds, LLC
Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. et al.
AbbVie Inc.
BTG International, Ltd. v. Zimmer Holdings
BTG International, Ltd.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.