Associate
William Neer is a registered patent attorney and former Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) law clerk who leverages his deep understanding of PTAB practice, patent litigation, and U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) procedures to help clients navigate complex patent disputes and strategic intellectual property (IP) matters.
William’s practice focuses on post-grant proceedings before the PTAB, including inter partes reviews (IPRs), ex parte reexaminations (EPRs), and other proceedings involving patent validity challenges. He has extensive experience developing invalidity positions for complex litigations; drafting petitions and substantive briefing; conducting discretionary denial analyses; preparing and examining expert witnesses; and coordinating litigation strategies in parallel proceedings. William also advises clients on broader patent strategy matters, including freedom-to-operate (FTO) and validity assessments, due diligence, portfolio counseling, prosecution-related issues, and litigation risk management.
William has represented leading technology companies in matters involving wireless communications, location-based services, media systems, and voice and messaging technologies. His technical background includes matters involving pharmaceuticals, polymer science, specialty chemicals, solar and semiconductor technology, medical devices, and related technologies. This foundation allows him to bridge patent office practice and district court litigation, providing clients with integrated strategies throughout the patent life cycle.
William served as a judicial law clerk at the PTAB, where he assisted Administrative Patent Judges in adjudicating America Invents Act (AIA) proceedings and ex parte appeals spanning chemical, electrical, mechanical, pharmaceutical, and design technologies. During his clerkship, he also completed a rotation in the Office of the Director of the USPTO, working on matters involving Director Review, the Precedential Opinion Panel, delegated rehearing issues, and agency policy initiatives. Additionally, William served as a judicial intern at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC).
William also devotes a portion of his practice to pro bono matters, earning him a spot on the Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll. He has worked with asylum-seeking clients and represented clients in veterans appeals.
At the PTAB Blog
The Proof Is in the Priority: Director Squires Addresses Antedating and Prior-Art Qualification The Proof Is in the Priority: Director Squires Addresses Antedating and Prior-Art Qualification
September 14, 2026
At the PTAB Blog
New Informative Decision Applies the USPTO’s U.S. Manufacturing and Small Business Use of AIA Proceedings Memo New Informative Decision Applies the USPTO’s U.S. Manufacturing and Small Business Use of AIA Proceedings Memo
June 18, 2026
At the PTAB Blog
Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions
May 29, 2026
At the PTAB Blog
Before the Holding, the Message: Director Squires Uses Magnolia Medical to Outline PTAB Discretionary Denial Policy Changes Before the Holding, the Message: Director Squires Uses Magnolia Medical to Outline PTAB Discretionary Denial Policy Changes
May 20, 2026
At the PTAB Blog
Updates on Director Summary Notices for Decisions on Institution Updates on Director Summary Notices for Decisions on Institution
November 24, 2025
Award/Ranking
61 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2025 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll 61 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2025 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll
May 7, 2026
Award/Ranking
56 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2024 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll 56 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2024 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll
April 24, 2025
DC BarDue to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.