Associate
Soniya Shah focuses on patent litigation and prosecution. She handles intellectual property matters related to electronics and information technology, including computer hardware; software; artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML); electrical and computer technology; cryptography and authentication; cryptocurrencies, digital assets and exchanges; and non-fungible tokens (NFTs).
Soniya prosecutes patent applications before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Her experience includes drafting and prosecuting applications for inventions relating to cybersecurity, computer software, financial services, cryptocurrencies and NFTs, and manufacturing technologies. Soniya has extensive experience working with dual-use and defense-related export controls. She helps businesses remain compliant with U.S. trade regulations and export matters, including compliance with the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), and U.S. embargoes and sanctions.
While in law school, Soniya worked as a law clerk focused on global trade and policy such as economic sanctions, export controls, and trade policy matters, including Section 301 tariff changes and exclusion requests. She also worked as a summer associate at Finnegan, assisting with research matters in the virtual reality and renewable energy spaces.
Upon completing her undergraduate studies, Soniya worked as a technical writer for an analytic database management software company. She wrote product documentation for machine learning and security and catalogued best practices for the management system.
Soniya devotes a portion of her time to pro bono matters and has experience with asylum cases.
Prosecution First Blog
What Is an “Account”? Nonobviousness Argument Based Only on Proposed Construction Backfires for Caselas What Is an “Account”? Nonobviousness Argument Based Only on Proposed Construction Backfires for Caselas
November 11, 2022
Prosecution First Blog
Roche Wins Reprieve from $137 Million Jury Verdict Roche Wins Reprieve from $137 Million Jury Verdict
October 7, 2022
Articles
Federal Court Rejects Massachusetts’s Statute On Out-of-State Forum Selection Clauses Federal Court Rejects Massachusetts’s Statute On Out-of-State Forum Selection Clauses
September 19, 2022
LES InsightsProsecution First Blog
On-Sale Bar: The “Critical Date” Is Critical On-Sale Bar: The “Critical Date” Is Critical
August 26, 2022
Articles
A Breach of Contract Involving Cryptocurrency as Compensation Results in $25 Million Awarded in Damages A Breach of Contract Involving Cryptocurrency as Compensation Results in $25 Million Awarded in Damages
August 15, 2022
LES InsightsProsecution First Blog
Federal Circuit Upholds $13.6 Million Jury Verdict of Willful Infringement After Affirming the District Court’s Correction of Claims Federal Circuit Upholds $13.6 Million Jury Verdict of Willful Infringement After Affirming the District Court’s Correction of Claims
August 5, 2022
Due to international data regulations, we’ve recently updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
The Finnegan UPC Hub is a one-stop shop for our insights related to the Unified Patent Court (UPC).