直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
Alissa E. Green
Associate
More
vCard
  • 901 New York Avenue, NW
  • Washington, DC 20001-4413
+1 202 408 4305
alissa.green@finnegan.com alissa.green@finnegan.com

Alissa E. Green

Associate

  • +1 202 408 4305 +1 202 408 4305
  • alissa.green@finnegan.com alissa.green@finnegan.com
  • 901 New York Avenue, NW
  • Washington, DC 20001-4413
  • vCard

Alissa Green focuses on patent litigation, specifically before U.S. district courts and the International Trade Commission (ITC), as well as post-grant review proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). She draws from her experience as a former middle and high school math and AP physics teacher to provide clear guidance to clients and craft persuasive arguments in district courts as well as before the PTAB.

Alissa is experienced in all stages of district court litigation, including identifying validity and infringement strategies, drafting dispositive briefings, drafting and arguing motions, and developing and arguing claim construction positions. Several of her cases have involved co-pending district court litigation and post-grant proceedings, and Alissa regularly aids clients in navigating the interplay between these forums.

Having litigated numerous post-grant review proceedings from filing to resolution, Alissa has experience developing validity strategy, crafting effective briefing, deposing expert witnesses, and participating in oral hearings, including as arguing counsel. Alissa represents both petitioners and patent owners before the PTAB, including in derivation proceedings.

Alissa also performs domestic and international counseling in the design, mechanical, and electrical spaces, including in the heavy machinery and consumer products industries. Her technical experience encompasses both mechanical and electrical technologies, including those in the artificial intelligence, networking systems, search engine optimization, and electronic banking industries.

Prior to law school, Alissa taught middle school and high school math and science in Arizona. She independently created an advanced placement (AP) physics curriculum and co-led a robotics team that placed second in the state competition.

Alissa maintains a pro bono practice, aiding immigrants seeking asylum and serving as a guardian ad litem. She has been recognized on the Capital Pro Bono High Honor Roll.

Et Cetera

  • Coauthor. “Artificial Intelligence,” Intellectual Property Law Institute 2019, September 2019.
  • Winner, Patent Administrative Law Conference Writing Competition, 2019.
  • President, American University’s Intellectual Property Law Society, 2018-2019. 
  • Recipient, Washington College of Law Merit Scholarship, 2016-2019.
  • Judicial intern, U.S. Court of Federal Claims for the Honorable Mary Ellen Coster Williams, 2017.

Experience

Stragent, LLC v. BMW et al.

Obtained a royalty-free license to Stragent’s entire patent portfolio after forcing Stragent to concede in open court that it could not present enough evidence to prove infringement of its asserted patents, which Stragent read on the automotive communications standard AUTOSAR. Successfully invalidated multiple of Stragent’s patents before the Patent Office, with one victory on appeal and additional IPR petitions pending at the time of case resolution.

1:20-cv-00510, D. Del., Judge Wolson
1:23-cv-00005, D. Del., Judge Wolson
IPR2023-00333, -00334, PTAB
22-2062 , Fed. Cir.
IPR2021-00417, -00418, -00419, PTAB, Judges Galligan, Repko, White

Bright Data Ltd. v. NetNut Ltd.

Represented NetNut in litigation in the Eastern District of Texas against Bright Data, related to Bright Data’s patents and trade secrets involving proxy server technology. The case resulted in a favorable dismissal for the client.

2:20-cv-00188, E.D. Tex., Judges Gilstrap, Payne

Auth Token LLC v. Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Represented Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) in litigation in the Middle District of Florida against Auth Token, related to Auth Token’s patents involving smart banking card technology. The case resulted in a favorable dismissal for FIS.

3-22-cv-00268, M.D. Fla., Judges Howard, Richardson

Universal Arbor LLC v. Robert Bosch GmbH

Represented Bosch in a patent litigation in the Eastern District of Texas against Universal Arbor related to accessories for oscillating power tools. The case resulted in a favorable dismissal for the client.

2:22-cv-00155, E.D. Tex., Judges Gilstrap, Payne

Nested Bean, Inc. v. Big Beings USA Pty. Ltd. et al.

Representing Big Beings dba Love To Dream in an IPR before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) involving baby swaddle suits.

IPR2020-01234, PTAB, Judges Weatherly, Cherry, Pinkerton

In the Matter of Certain Semiconductor Devices and Products Containing the Same

Achieved a comprehensive victory for respondent Innoscience, a global leader in gallium nitride (GaN) power devices, in a high-profile patent dispute before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The ITC’s Final Determination confirms that Innoscience avoided all patent claims asserted by Infineon.

337‑TA‑1414, ITC, Judge Moore

More

Insights

Podcasts

Inventorship & the AIA: The Federal Circuit’s First Derivation Decision - Part 2

Inventorship & the AIA: The Federal Circuit’s First Derivation Decision - Part 2 Inventorship & the AIA: The Federal Circuit’s First Derivation Decision - Part 2

October 13, 2025

Download

Podcasts

Inventorship & the AIA: The Federal Circuit’s First Derivation Decision - Part 1

Inventorship & the AIA: The Federal Circuit’s First Derivation Decision - Part 1 Inventorship & the AIA: The Federal Circuit’s First Derivation Decision - Part 1

October 8, 2025

Download

Articles

Key Takeaways from BMW’s Victory Against NorthStar

Key Takeaways from BMW’s Victory Against NorthStar Key Takeaways from BMW’s Victory Against NorthStar

April 30, 2024

Articles

Is Hedonic Regression a Viable Damages Framework? The Federal Circuit Leaves this Question Open in VLSI Technology LLC v. Intel

Is Hedonic Regression a Viable Damages Framework? The Federal Circuit Leaves this Question Open in VLSI Technology LLC v. Intel

Is Hedonic Regression a Viable Damages Framework? The Federal Circuit Leaves this Question Open in VLSI Technology LLC v. Intel

January 30, 2024

Webinar

Patent Damages and Valuation, Part II: Geographic Scope

Patent Damages and Valuation, Part II: Geographic Scope Patent Damages and Valuation, Part II: Geographic Scope

August 29, 2023

Webinar

Webinar

Patent Damages and Valuation, Part I: Value Apportionment

Patent Damages and Valuation, Part I: Value Apportionment Patent Damages and Valuation, Part I: Value Apportionment

August 15, 2023

Webinar

More

News

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination

May 11, 2026

Commentary

ITC Bars Import of Innoscience Chips Made Before Redesign ITC Bars Import of Innoscience Chips Made Before Redesign

May 8, 2026

Law360

Commentary

CBP Clears Redesigned Innoscience Chips After ITC Case CBP Clears Redesigned Innoscience Chips After ITC Case

March 12, 2026

Law360

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Major ITC Victory in Initial Determination for Innoscience Finnegan Secures Major ITC Victory in Initial Determination for Innoscience

January 29, 2026

Commentary

ITC Judge Clears Innoscience's Redesigned Semiconductor ITC Judge Clears Innoscience's Redesigned Semiconductor

January 29, 2026

Law360

Announcement

Finnegan Announces 2025 Mentors of the Year Finnegan Announces 2025 Mentors of the Year

December 19, 2025

More

Professional Activities

  • American Bar Association
  • American Intellectual Property Law Association
  • Intellectual Property Owners Association
  • PTAB Bar Association
    (vice chair, Women's Committee, 2025-present)
Admissions and Education

Admissions

  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
  • District of Columbia
  • U.S. District Court, E.D. Texas
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Education

American University, Washington College of Law
J.D., cum laude, 2019
Northern Arizona University
B.S., Civil Engineering, 2010

Alissa's Practices

AI + Finnegan
AI + Patent
Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
Opinions and Counseling
Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
Design Rights
ITC Section 337 Investigations and Trials
Patent Litigation and Trials
Pretrial Strategies
Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
Derivations
Ex Parte Reexamination (EPR)
PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR
Prosecution and Portfolio Management
Appeals to the PTAB
Design Rights
Patent Drafting and Prosecution

Alissa's Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML)
Electrical and Computer Technology
Electronic Devices and Components
Robotics
Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
Additive Manufacturing
Manufacturing
Communications
Financial Services and Business Systems
Consumer Goods and Services
Consumer Products
Energy
Clean Energy and Renewables
Transportation and Logistics
Automotive and Smart Mobility Tech

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP