July 31, 2024
On July 31, 2024, the U.S. Copyright Office issued the first section of its much-anticipated policy report regarding artificial intelligence and copyright. This section concerns the use of AI to create unauthorized images or recordings that impersonate others by mimicking their voice or visual likeness—also known as “deepfakes” or “digital replicas”—such as AI-generated musical performances and robocall impersonations of political candidates.
Finding that new federal legislation is “urgently needed,” the Copyright Office recommends that Congress establish a federal right to protect all individuals during their lifetimes from the knowing distribution of unauthorized digital replicas. Existing state laws, according to the Copyright Office, are inconsistent and insufficient to address harms that can be inflicted by noncommercial uses of AI-generated images and recordings. Specifically, the Copyright Office recommends that an individual’s federal right should be:
In addition, the Copyright Office recommends that the statute be balanced with First Amendment considerations and include a safe harbor mechanism that incentivizes online service providers to remove unauthorized digital replicas after receiving effective notice or otherwise obtaining knowledge that they are unauthorized.
The Copyright Office does not recommend including “style” as protected subject matter under a federal digital replica law at this time.
The Copyright Office’s recommendations come at a time when Congress is considering multiple proposals to address the use of unauthorized digital replicas in various contexts. For example, the No Artificial Intelligence Fake Replicas and Unauthorized Duplications (“No AI FRAUD”) Act, and the discussion draft of the Nurture Originals, Foster Art, and Keep Entertainment Safe (“NO FAKES”) Act of 2023, would each establish a federal framework for protecting against the use of unauthorized digital voice replicas and digital depictions that readily identify an individual. Other legislative proposals include the REAL Political Advertisements Act, which would require political advertisements to disclaim the use of AI-generated sounds or images; the Protect Elections from Deceptive AI Act, which would make it a crime to distribute deceptive AI-generated media relating to federal elections; and the Preventing Deepfakes of Intimate Images Act, which would make it a crime to intentionally disclose or threaten to disclose AI-generated intimate digital depictions.
These legislative proposals would have implications for individuals, creators, and online service providers alike, and the Copyright Office’s recommendations may influence if and when any of them are enacted.
Click here to access the report.
Copyright © Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.
INCONTESTABLE® Blog
Netflix Prevails in Copyright Infringement Suit Regarding Tiger King
May 14, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
When “and” and “e.g.” Matter: Federal Circuit Revives VLSI vs. Intel Case
May 14, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Federal Circuit Affirms § 102(b) Invalidity; Source Code Commands Are Not Hearsay
May 14, 2026
Articles
Choice of Law in Patent Appeals: The Federal Circuit’s Issue-by-Issue Framework
May/June 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.