Food packaging may be nearly as important as the food in the package. In 2010, Heinz launched the Dip & Squeeze ketchup packet, claiming it was the first upgrade in the ketchup packet in more than forty years. In 2013, Anheuser-Busch InBev launched a screw-top aluminum bottle, which was a hit with consumers. These bottles are recyclable and lightweight, and are said to keep the beer cooler longer than glass bottles. Sales of the aluminum bottles have quadrupled since 2013. And what do these packages have in common? They are both protected by design patents.
D739,732, Metal Beverage
In fact, food and beverage companies should consider design patents for at least three reasons.
Luxury candy maker Sugarfina makes many different kinds of candy. Rather than protecting all of those different candies, Sugarfina has protected its Bento Box packaging with a series of design rights protecting its many different configurations (e.g., three sets of candies, eight sets of candies, etc.).
Likewise, in 2014, Kraft introduced a three-part packaging for its P3 Portable Protein Pack snacks, containing small portions of nuts, meats, and cheese. Before introducing this product (U.S. design patents must be filed within one year of public disclosure of a design), Kraft filed a series of design patent applications covering its “dumbbell”-shaped packaging. More recently, Kraft has expanded this packaging to its Trios Snackfulls line, which are likely covered by the existing patents. Kraft’s example shows that design patents for packaging are independent of their contents, meaning that your IP can continue to work for you even when you expand your line of products.
But most importantly, these patents don’t just decorate the walls of these companies. Sugarfina and Kraft have recently filed to suit to keep competitors from mimicking their patented product packaging.
In July, Sugarfina filed suits against multiple competitors claiming infringement of its design, trade dress, and copyright rights in certain product packaging, including its Bento Box. See, e.g., Sugarfina, Inc., v. Bouquet Bar, Inc. et al, Case No. 8:18-cv-1305 (C.D. Cal., filed July 27, 2018). Just last week, Kraft filed suit against D6, Inc. asserting two design patents directed to its dumb-bell shaped snack packages. Kraft alleges that D6 is providing packaging to various food companies who are selling packaged food at groceries stores in Texas. Kraft Foods Group Brands, Inc. v. D6 Inc., Case No. 3-18-cv-01653 (D. Or., filed September 12, 2018). Both cases are still pending.
These are just a few good reasons to consider design patent protection for your new food packaging!
Click here to read other articles in our series.
November 1, 2018
September 7, 2018
December 11, 2018
October 11, 2018
January 10, 2019
October 23, 2018
October 22, 2018
October 23, 2018
August 23, 2018