INCONTESTABLE® Blog
April 19, 2024
Webinar
Advertising Self-Regulation in 2024: Q&A with NAD Vice President Laura Brett
January 30, 2024
Never miss an Insight.
Sign upEvent
Patent Ownership and Inventorship: Avoiding Pitfalls in Defending Against Infringement and Enforcing Patents Patent Ownership and Inventorship: Avoiding Pitfalls in Defending Against Infringement and Enforcing Patents
August 03, 2023
Webinar
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Federal Circuit Confirms Joint Inventorship on Nobel Prize Winner’s Cancer Treatment Patents Federal Circuit Confirms Joint Inventorship on Nobel Prize Winner’s Cancer Treatment Patents
July 21, 2020
Books
ANDA Litigation: Strategies and Tactics for Pharmaceutical Patent Litigators, Third Edition ANDA Litigation: Strategies and Tactics for Pharmaceutical Patent Litigators, Third Edition
June 16, 2020
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Corroborating Evidence of Conception Must Be Independent of Inventor Testimony Corroborating Evidence of Conception Must Be Independent of Inventor Testimony
May 4, 2018
Federal Circuit IP Blog
USPTO Can Receive Its Attorneys’ Fees for Applicant Appeals to District Court USPTO Can Receive Its Attorneys’ Fees for Applicant Appeals to District Court
June 30, 2017
Federal Circuit IP Blog
No Abuse of Discretion in Awarding Prejudgment Interest Based in Part on Patents Not Yet Issued at the Time of Hypothetical Negotiation No Abuse of Discretion in Awarding Prejudgment Interest Based in Part on Patents Not Yet Issued at the Time of Hypothetical Negotiation
April 18, 2017
IP Health Blog
FDA Final Rule on Citizen Petitions, Petitions for Stay of Action, and Submission of Documents to Dockets FDA Final Rule on Citizen Petitions, Petitions for Stay of Action, and Submission of Documents to Dockets
January 10, 2017
IP Health Blog
CAFC Holds Patentee’s Diligence Required for Antedating Prior Art Is Reasonably Continuous in Perfect Surgical v. Olympus CAFC Holds Patentee’s Diligence Required for Antedating Prior Art Is Reasonably Continuous in Perfect Surgical v. Olympus
December 1, 2016
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Diligence Required for Antedating Prior Art Is Reasonably Continuous Diligence—Not Continuous Exercise of Reasonable Diligence Diligence Required for Antedating Prior Art Is Reasonably Continuous Diligence—Not Continuous Exercise of Reasonable Diligence
November 29, 2016
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.