直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Webinar

The Real-World Implications of Alice, Nautilus, Limelight, and Octane Fitness—What Every Corporate IP Counsel Needs to Know

September 18, 2014

Webinar

View Webinar

The Supreme Court recently issued an unprecedented number of decisions having a substantial impact on the practice of patent law and the management of intellectual property assets. For corporate IP counsel, the questions raised by these decisions are both immediate and important. Please join our panel as they discuss the Supreme Court’s recent decisions in Alice, Nautilus, Limelight, and Octane Fitness and how these decisions may affect your day-to-day responsibilities for managing patent prosecution and litigation.

Topics will include:

  • What impact will the Alice decision have on patent portfolios oriented toward computer implemented methods and business methods?
  • What can be done to mitigate the impact of Alice on these types of portfolios?
  • Does the Nautilus decision require a whole new approach to patent claiming? Will it change the way indefiniteness is litigated in the district courts?
  • What are the potential implications of the Limelight decision?
  • Does Octane Fitness change the way cost-benefit analyses should be performed for potential and threatened patent litigations?

Speakers:

James R. Barney 
Jeffrey A. Berkowitz

Date:
Thursday, September 18, 2014

Time:

1:00-2:00 pm EDT

Downloadable Files

  • Webinar: The Real-World Implications of Alice, Nautilus, Limelight, and Octane Fitness—What Every Corporate IP Counsel Needs to Know

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Prosecution and Portfolio Management

IP Portfolio Management

Related Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology

Electrical and Computer Technology

Communications

Financial Services and Business Systems

Life Sciences

Medical Device and Diagnostics

Biotechnology

Related Professionals

James R. Barney
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4412
Email
Jeffrey A. Berkowitz
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2710
Email

Related Insights

Conference

IAM Live: Navigating the UPC 2026

November 3, 2026

Paris

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Conference

2026 AIPLA Annual Meeting

October 29-31, 2026

Washington, DC

Conference

2026 EDTX Bench Bar Conference

October 28-30, 2026

Fort Worth

Conference

ChIPs Global Summit 2026

October 21-23, 2026

Los Angeles

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California

October 19-20, 2026

San Francisco

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York

September 28-29, 2026

New York

Conference

2026 IPO Annual Meeting

September 27-29, 2026

Toronto

Lecture

Resolving Patent Suits Without Settlement Payments

September 3, 2026

Virtual

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP