直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Last Quarter at the Federal Circuit

August 4, 2011

Webinar

Keeping up with the growing body of case law is a must for IP lawyers. Federal Circuit decisions can impact your client’s IP portfolio strategy on many levels and in significant or subtle ways. Some decisions are of particular importance and well worth a closer look.

The editorial team of Finnegan’s Last Month at the Federal Circuit newsletter is pleased to present a quarterly series of webinars that will examine significant cases and offer expert commentary on the implications and potential impact.

Please join our panelists as they discuss:

TiVo, Inc. v. Echostar, Corp., No. 09-1374 (Fed. Cir. April 20, 2011) 

     Federal Circuit announces new rules for post-injunction contempt proceedings against modified products

     Court declines to vacate its en banc opinion after the parties later settled

Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Company., No. 08-1551, -1512, -1513, -1514, -1595 (Fed. Cir. May 25, 2011)

     Raises the standards for proving both intent and materiality prongs for inequitable conduct

     Court requires district courts to employ an equitable analysis even after materiality and intent are proven




Moderator


Elizabeth D. Ferrill

Speakers

Anthony A. Hartmann

J. Michael Jakes

Time

1:00 - 2:00 p.m. EDT

Register

There is no charge to attend this program. Please register by August 1, 2011. Webinar access and dial-in information will be sent upon registration.

Downloadable Files

  • FCN August 2011

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Related Professionals

Elizabeth D. Ferrill
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4445
Email
Anthony A. Hartmann
Of Counsel
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4275
Email
J. Michael Jakes
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4045
Email

Related Insights

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: April 2026

June 1, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a    
§ 325(d) EPR Denial

May 28, 2026

Articles

Colorado Replaces Landmark AI Act: An Overview of the New SB 26-189 Framework

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in March and April 2026

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Claim Disclaimer Derails Instituted IPR in Freightcar America

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Before the Holding, the Message: Director Squires Uses Magnolia Medical to Outline PTAB Discretionary Denial Policy Changes

May 20, 2026

Webinar

Changes at the PTAB from Settled Expectations to Real Parties in Interest to Director Involvement

May 18, 2026

Webinar

Articles

COPPA’s Amended Rule Is Now in Full Effect: What Operators Need to Know

May 15, 2026

Seminar

IP Strategy at the Crossroads: Technology, Enforcement, and Contracts

May 15, 2026

Taipei

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP