September 28, 2016
Webinar
Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO)
As part of an IPO webinar series, Finnegan partner Eric P. Raciti will participate in a webinar discussion on patent prosecution practice since last year's en banc Federal Circuit decision in Williamson v. Citrix, covering the criteria used by the USPTO to decide whether a claim invokes Section 112(f) and what structural disclosure is enough to support such a claim. Panelists will also discuss the pros and cons of having a claim fall under Section 112(f) considering recent tighter application of Sections 112(b) and Section 101, the latest on best practices for prosecuting patents, and the concern that patents still being approved by the USPTO might not pass muster in litigation. For more information, or to register, please see the IPO's website.
indefiniteness (35 USC § 112), 35 U.S.C. § 101, Williamson v. Citrix Online, means-plus-function claim
Webinar
PTAB Developments and Their Impact on Parallel Litigation: Strategic Considerations
August 26, 2026
Webinar
At the PTAB Blog
IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in June and July 2026
August 19, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.