September 28, 2016
Webinar
Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO)
As part of an IPO webinar series, Finnegan partner Eric P. Raciti will participate in a webinar discussion on patent prosecution practice since last year's en banc Federal Circuit decision in Williamson v. Citrix, covering the criteria used by the USPTO to decide whether a claim invokes Section 112(f) and what structural disclosure is enough to support such a claim. Panelists will also discuss the pros and cons of having a claim fall under Section 112(f) considering recent tighter application of Sections 112(b) and Section 101, the latest on best practices for prosecuting patents, and the concern that patents still being approved by the USPTO might not pass muster in litigation. For more information, or to register, please see the IPO's website.
indefiniteness (35 USC § 112), 35 U.S.C. § 101, Williamson v. Citrix Online, means-plus-function claim
Webinar
Early Motions in Trade Secret Litigation – Offensive and Defensive Insights
July 15, 2026
Webinar
Federal Circuit IP Blog
July 8, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
July 8, 2026
Webinar
Inventive Step in Europe and the US: Comparing the UPC, EPO and National Approaches
July 8, 2026
Webinar
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.