January 22, 2016
Authored and Edited by Leslie A. McDonell
On September 18, 2015, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) launched a Streamlined, Expedited Patent Appeal Pilot (S-EPAP) program for Small Entities. As with the Expedited Patent Appeal Pilot (EPAP) program, the S-EPAP program for Small Entities is intended to reduce the overall number of appeals pending before the Board.
Typically, patent appeals are taken up by the Board in the order in which they are docketed; the current average pendency of an ex parte appeal is around 30 months. The current pendency of decided appeals in applications for each Technology Center decided this fiscal year is shown in the following table:

Under the S-EPAP program for Small Entities, a small or micro entity appellant who has only a single appeal pending before the Board, and agrees to streamline the appeal may file a request to have the appeal granted special status and advanced out of turn for a Board decision. The goal of the pilot program is for the Board to render a decision on the appeal granted special status no later than six months from the date of filing of the petition. As a result, the streamlining of an appeal could potentially expedite the time it takes for the invention to be patented and brought to the marketplace.
To participate in S-EPAP program for Small Entities, an appellant need only make a certification and file a petition to make special under 37 C.F.R. 41.3 (Form PTO/SB/438) to the Chief Administrative Patent Judge. The USPTO provides a form-fillable PDF (Form PTO/SB/441) for use in the certification and petition, and waives the petition to make special fee in this instance. The petition under 37 CFR 41.3 must be signed by a registered practitioner who has a power of attorney under 37 CFR 1.32, or has authority to act under 37 CFR 1.34, for the application involved in the appeal to be made special.
In the petition, appellant must:
The Board’s goal for handling an S-EPAP application is to:
The USPTO adopted S-EPAP for Small Entities on a temporary basis, i.e., until two thousand (2,000) appeals have been accorded special status under the program, or until September 16, 2016, whichever occurs earlier. As with other pilot programs, the USPTO may extend the pilot program, depending upon its results.
Currently, the USPTO has not published any statistics on S-EPAP for Small Entities.
For more information on the S-EPAP program for Small Entities, visit their FAQs page on the USPTO website.
Copyright © 2016 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
At the PTAB Blog
IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in March and April 2026
May 26, 2026
At the PTAB Blog
May 20, 2026
Conference
19th Annual Forum on Pharma & Biotech Patent Litigation in Europe
May 19-20, 2026
Amsterdam
Webinar
Changes at the PTAB from Settled Expectations to Real Parties in Interest to Director Involvement
May 18, 2026
Webinar
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Federal Circuit Affirms § 102(b) Invalidity; Source Code Commands Are Not Hearsay
May 14, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
When “and” and “e.g.” Matter: Federal Circuit Revives VLSI vs. Intel Case
May 14, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.