直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

INCONTESTABLE® Blog

Sofia Vergara Successfully Shuts Down “Fan Site” Via UDRP Proceeding

March 03, 2015

Authored and Edited by Eleanor Atkins

A WIPO panel recently found in favor of Sofia Vergara regarding her objection to registration of the sofiavergara.org domain name, and the use of the domain for a pay-per-click website featuring content and advertising links for many famous celebrities, including Vergara. Among other things, Vergara asserted that the respondent’s use of the domain for a pay-per-click site – coupled with his subsequent attempt to sell the domain to Vergara for $10,000 – was in bad faith.

The domain registrant unsuccessfully argued that the domain name was being used for a fan site and therefore constituted noncommercial fair use. Specifically, respondent argued that the site’s use of the tag line “We love her,” along with displays of Vergara’s own Instagram pictures, were proof that the website was merely a fan site.

Not persuaded, the one-member WIPO panel found that the posts and links to content on numerous celebrities other than Sofia Vergara contradicted the registrant’s fair use argument that the domain was simply a fan site dedicated to Vergara. The panel further held that the numerous pay-per-click advertisements weighed against protected fair use: “The vice in the conduct, at least for present purposes, is not the posting of such snippets [on other celebrities] but the use of the Respondent’s trademark to attract traffic to his website. That does not qualify as ‘fair use’ under the Policy.”

Finally, the panel held that the respondent’s offer to sell the disputed domain name to the complainant for $10,000 demonstrated further evidence of bad faith because the amount was “well in excess of the likely costs of registering the disputed domain name.”

Tags

WIPO

Related Practices

Domain Name Litigation and UDRPs

Trademark and Brand Management

Copyright © 2015 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Conference

LES 2026 Annual Meeting

October 18-21, 2026

San Diego

Articles

EPR Academy, Part 5 of 6: Special Considerations for Third-Party Requesters

October 14, 2026

Articles

Who Is a “Consumer?” The Supreme Court Takes Up the Video Privacy Protection Act

October 12, 2026

Articles

California Court Considers CIPA’s Application to Online Tracking as New Law Limits Private Actions

October 7, 2026

INCONTESTABLE® Blog

Finding a Lack of Bona Fide Use, TTAB Affirms Cancellation of Everwise Credit Union Registration Under the Lanham Act’s Reexamination Procedure

September 24, 2026

Articles

A “Side Bet” Option Does Not Create a Live Case or Controversy on Appeal

September 9, 2026

Webinar

U.S. Discovery for Foreign Proceedings—28 USC § 1782 Requirements and Practice Tips

September 2, 2026

Webinar

Articles

Beyond Hikma: Patent Prosecution Strategies  for Anticipating Skinny-Label Generics  in Pharmaceutical Patent Portfolios

September 2026

At the PTAB Blog

IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in June and July 2026

August 19, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP