直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Today in Federal Circuit History...

September 22, 2017

Authored and Edited by Elizabeth D. Ferrill; Alyssa Dolan, Emily Heim

 

On September 22, 2000, Chief Judge Haldane Robert Mayer signed an order establishing an Advisory Council for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Advisory Council) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2077(b).  The mission of the Advisory Council is to review, study, and make recommendations regarding the rules of practice and internal operating procedures of the Federal Circuit.  Additionally, the Advisory Council serves as a channel between the public and the court regarding procedural matters and suggestions for change.  The Advisory Council was also created to assist court personnel with the court’s judicial conference and court-sponsored educational programs.  The Chief Judge appoints the chair of the Advisory Council and selects all members of the Advisory Council, which consist of a maximum of fifteen active members of the bar and three ex officio members: the Clerk of the Court, the Senior Staff Attorney of the Court, and the president of the Court’s bar association.

The current active members and ex officio members of the Federal Circuit Advisory Council (as of October 1, 2016) are listed:

 

Tags

Federal Circuit History, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)

Contacts

Elizabeth D. Ferrill
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4445
Email

Copyright © 2017 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Panel Discussion

2026 Advanced Patent Law Institute

December 3-4, 2026

Stanford

Conference

2026 TIPA International Symposium

October 30, 2026

Taipei City

Lecture

2026 Donald R. Dunner Endowed Lecture

October 27, 2026

Washington, DC

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California

October 19-20, 2026

San Francisco

Hybrid Seminar

Annual Intellectual Property Law Section Fall Seminar

October 16, 2026

Alexandria

Conference

2026 FCBA Global Series Fall Session

October 14-16, 2026

Dublin

Webinar

2026 Inventive Step in Europe and the US: Comparing the UPC, EPO and National Approaches

October 14, 2026

Webinar

Articles

Who Is a “Consumer?” The Supreme Court Takes Up the Video Privacy Protection Act

October 12, 2026

INCONTESTABLE® Blog

Federal Court Orders Rebel Creamery to Redesign Packaging and Disgorge $23.8 Million in Van Leeuwen Trade Dress Case

October 7, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP