April 23, 2020
Authored and Edited by Kara A. Specht; Elizabeth D. Ferrill
In Thryv, Inc. v. Click-to-Call Techs, LP, the Supreme Court held that the PTAB’s determination of whether a petition is timely under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) is not judicially reviewable. Finnegan’s AIA Blog explains the details of the decision.
Copyright © 2020 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
Webinar
Inventive Step in Europe and the US: Comparing the UPC, EPO and National Approaches
July 8, 2026
Webinar
At the PTAB Blog
June 30, 2026
Articles
How Low Can You Go? Courts Lower Marking Defense Burden, Raising Patent Damages Risks
June 29, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.