Reply Evidence Sufficient to Establish Printed Publication Status of Reference
December 1, 2020
Authored and Edited by Caitlin E. Fowler; Elizabeth D. Ferrill
In VidStream LLC v. Twitter, Inc., Nos. 2019-1734, 2019-1735 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 25, 2020), the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s holding that Twitter’s primary reference qualified as prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a). In doing so, the Federal Circuit explained that the PTAB properly considered evidence submitted by Twitter in its reply brief that was not previously submitted in Twitter’s IPR petitions. For more detailed analysis of this case, please see Finnegan’s AIA blog.
Related Offices
Contacts
Copyright © 2020 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
