May 26, 2016
Authored and Edited by Elizabeth D. Ferrill; Hojung Cho Ph.D., Lauren J. Dreyer
In Diamond Coating Technologies v. Hyundai Motor America, Nos. 2015-1844, -1861 (Fed. Cir. May 17, 2016), the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision that Diamond lacked standing to pursue an infringement action without joining the original assignee of the patents-in-suit, Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd. The Court found that the original agreement between Diamond and Sanyo did not convey all of the substantial rights in the patents-in-suit to Diamond. The Federal Circuit focused on two problems with the assignment agreement: (1) the agreement did not grant Diamond a right to practice the patents-in-suit and instead vested that right in Sanyo; and (2) the agreement allowed Sanyo to retain significant control over Diamond’s enforcement and litigation services because, among other things, Diamond’s actions were conditioned on taking into consideration the “best interests” of both Diamond and Sanyo.
The Federal Circuit also rejected a nunc pro tunc agreement executed by Diamond and Sanyo after the district court’s decision, relying on its precedent in Alps South, LLC v. The Ohio Willow Wood Co., Nos. 2013-1452, -1488, 2014-1147, -1426 (Fed. Cir. June 5, 2015) that held that nunc pro tunc agreements do not confer retroactive patentee status.
Copyright © 2016 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
INCONTESTABLE® Blog
Courts and Legislators Addressing the Right of Publicity in the Age of AI
April 30, 2024
At the PTAB Blog
USPTO Releases Notice of Proposed Rule Making Codifying Several Precedential Case Factors
April 25, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.