直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Adopts Amendments to Federal Circuit Rules of Practice

March 3, 2023

Authored and Edited by Ryan V. McDonnell; Jason L. Romrell; Li Zhang, Ph.D.

On March 1, 2023, the Federal Circuit adopted a series of amendments to the Federal Circuit Rules of Practice. The new version of the Rules will apply to all cases filed or pending on or after March 1, 2023, to the extent applicable. The Federal Circuit has also adopted changes to Forms 1, 5, 6, 8B, 9, 9A, 16, 18, 24, 32, and 33. The updated and existing forms are available on the Court’s website and are to be used, as required, for any filings made on or after March 1, 2023. The Clerk’s Office has also issued updated versions of the Electronic Filing Procedures, Guide for Oral Argument, Guide for Unrepresented Parties, and additional content throughout the Court’s website. A summary of the more notable amendments in the adopted Rules is provided below:

  • Fed. Cir. R. 25: Reducing the required number of paper copies of en banc or combined petitions; reducing the required number of paper copies of briefs and appendices in en banc cases.

  • Fed. Cir. R. 27: Clarifying that requests for reconsideration of dispositive orders must be filed as a rehearing petition with limited exceptions.

  • Fed. Cir. R. 28: Moving the principal brief addendum requirements to their own subsection and addressing the length of addendum and the need for multi-volume addenda; adding heading and location requirements for the standard of review; relocating patent claim language requirement to Fed. Cir. R. 32(a); clarifying informal brief form requirement; requiring affirmative jurisdictional statement under a separate heading in informal response brief; adding Practice Note to address inclusion of patents in the addendum.

  • Fed. Cir. R. 30: Requiring service of a paper copy of the joint appendix on opposing counsel unless opposing counsel deems it unnecessary.

  • Fed. Cir. R. 31: Requiring service of a paper copy of each brief on opposing counsel unless opposing counsel deems it unnecessary.

  • Fed. Cir. R. 32: Relocating requirement to include patent claim language on inside front brief cover from Fed. Cir. R. 28; clarifying requirement that patent claim language “must include one or more exemplary patent claims illustrative of the issue(s) on appeal”; permitting single-spacing of patent claim language; excluding inside front cover contents and contents required on the first page of a filing in lieu of a cover from word counts; clarifying informal brief form and type-volume requirements.

  • Fed. Cir. R. 33: Eliminating settlement negotiation certification requirement; adding language encouraging parties to keep the court apprised of ongoing settlement discussions to the extent possible; merging mediation provision of Fed. Cir. R. 33.1 into Fed. Cir. R. 33 and deleting Fed. Cir. R. 33.1.

  • Fed. Cir. R. 34: Requiring parties to file argument scheduling conflict notice, even if no conflicts exist; requiring arguing counsel to have copies of each brief and appendix (paper or electronic) close at hand during oral argument; adding Practice Note encouraging parties to bring paper copies of each brief and appendix.

  • Fed. Cir. R. 42: Adding Practice Note that using Federal Circuit Form 18 satisfies the requirement to stipulate to dismissal of an appeal under FRAP 42(b)(1).

  • Fed. Cir. R. 47.4: Adding requirement for indication of related or prior cases that meet the criteria under Fed. Cir. R. 47.5 in the Certificate of Interest.

  • Fed. Cir. R. 47.5: Creating expanded notice requirement when there are related cases in other tribunals in order to provide the court with more information on participating parties, firms, and attorneys; adding Practice Note that using Federal Circuit Form 9A satisfies the new requirement for the parties to file a separate Notice of Related Case Information with the Certificate of Interest.

  • Fed. Cir. R. 47.6: Creating new rule incorporating Mediation Guidelines docketing statement requirement and requiring use of Form 26 for docketing statement; requiring each party to file a form docketing statement within 14 days of docketing (30 days if the U.S., its officer or agency is a party).

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Related Offices

Boston, MA

Washington, DC

Contacts

Ryan V. McDonnell
Associate
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4167
Email
Jason L. Romrell
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4349
Email
Li Zhang, Ph.D.
Associate
Boston, MA
+1 617 646 1648
Email

Copyright © 2023 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 

DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Charitable

Bridges From School to Work Gala 2026

June 22, 2026

Washington, DC

Charitable

Banding Together 2026

June 18, 2026

Washington, DC

At the PTAB Blog

Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a    
§ 325(d) EPR Denial

May 28, 2026

Articles

Colorado Replaces Landmark AI Act: An Overview of the New SB 26-189 Framework

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in March and April 2026

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Claim Disclaimer Derails Instituted IPR in Freightcar America

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Before the Holding, the Message: Director Squires Uses Magnolia Medical to Outline PTAB Discretionary Denial Policy Changes

May 20, 2026

Webinar

Changes at the PTAB from Settled Expectations to Real Parties in Interest to Director Involvement

May 18, 2026

Webinar

Conference

Best Practices and Tech in Intellectual Property Conference 2026

May 17, 2026

Tel Aviv

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP