直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

European IP Blog

Drafting for Multiple Jurisdictions Miniseries: Part I - Grace Period Provisions

August 17, 2020

Authored and Edited by Kyu Yun Kim; Maeve O'Flynn; Ningling Wang; Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D.; K. Victoria Barker, Ph.D.; Thomas Lee Irving; Stacy Lewis*

Many patent owners are interested in trying to draft a single patent application that will serve them in several countries. This is ambitious, since there are many differences between various countries’ patent systems, but perhaps not impossible. The patent drafter just needs to be aware of and try to balance all the different requirements in the single patent application. This series of articles will outline some important considerations when drafting a single patent application. Our first article in this series looks at the grace period provisions in the U.S., Korea, China, and the European Patent Office (“EPO”) and can be found on Finnegan’s AIA Blog.  

Tags

European Patent Office (EPO), prior art, America Invents Act (AIA), China, Korea, United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Drafting for Multiple Jurisdictions Miniseries

Related Offices

London

Shanghai

Washington, DC

Contacts

Maeve O'Flynn
Partner
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2856
Email
Ningling Wang
Partner
Shanghai
+86 21 6194 2005
Email
Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D.
Partner
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2814
Email
K. Victoria Barker, Ph.D.
Associate
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2822
Email

Copyright © 2020 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Reception

2026 IPO Education Foundation Awards Dinner

December 15, 2026

Washington, DC

Panel Discussion

2026 Advanced Patent Law Institute

December 3-4, 2026

Stanford

Conference

IPBC Asia 2026

November 17-19, 2026

Tokyo

Conference

IAM Live: Navigating the UPC 2026

November 4, 2026

Paris

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Seminar

Future IP UK

October 21, 2026

London

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California

October 19-20, 2026

San Francisco

Conference

2026 FCBA Global Series Fall Session

October 14-16, 2026

Dublin

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York

September 28-29, 2026

New York

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP