6 February 2025
Authored and Edited by Hannah Whitmore, Ph.D.; Varuni Paranavitane, Ph.D.
A trade secret or confidential information can be enforced against a third party which has made or is likely to make unauthorised use of the information to the detriment of the holder, if the holder has taken certain measures to protect the information. The UK Courts have wide discretion to order an injunction, damages or other remedies.
For example, in Derma Med Limited v Ally1the Court of Appeal considered that an interim injunction should be granted against the defendant, Dr Ally.
Dr Ally a leading aesthetics practitioner sold his business in relation to cosmetic fillers to Derma Med. The share purchase agreement contained restrictions on Dr Ally not to compete with Derma Med and not to misuse its confidential information. Dr Ally agreed to remain as an employee at Derma Med following completion.
Derma Med alleged that Dr Ally had taken cash payments from patients following completion, and had been soliciting other employees to leave Derma Med. There was prima facie evidence that Dr Ally had breached his obligations and acted dishonestly by diverting business from Derma Med to himself and was using Derma Med’s confidential information in order to do so. Further, he had taken extensive steps to conceal his wrongdoing. After Dr Ally resigned from Derma Med, they applied for an injunction to enforce Dr Ally’s non-compete and confidentiality obligations. The injunction was granted and then discharged by Justice Bourne.
The Court of Appeal considered the evidence of Dr Ally’s breaches and his attempts to conceal his acts and granted an interim injunction restraining him from competing and using Derma Med’s confidential information until trial.
This judgment is a useful reminder to businesses as it indicates that an injunction is likely to be the most appropriate effective remedy in certain cases where there is a clear breach of non-compete agreements and misuse of confidential information.
However, in order to be granted an injunction in relation to misuse of trade secrets or confidential information, it is very important that the information which is claimed to have been taken is kept secret.
The Trade Secrets Directive in the UK was implemented in June 2018 by the Trade Secrets (Enforcement etc) Regulations (the ‘Regulation’) which defined a trade secret as information which is:
(a) is secret in the sense that it is not, as a body or in the precise configuration and assembly of its components, generally known among or readily accessible to persons within the circles that normally deal with the kind of information in question;
(b) has commercial value because it is secret; and
(c) has been subject to reasonable steps under the circumstances, by the person lawfully in control of the information, to keep it secret.”
In addition, UK jurisprudence has a well-developed equitable doctrine to protect confidential information which pre-dates the Regulation.
Information designated as a Trade Secret or confidential information may include formulas, practices, processes, designs, instruments, patterns, or databases of information.
If trade secrets or confidential information of a business has or is likely to be misused by a third-party competitor, this could have a detrimental impact on the business. Therefore, in certain cases, the value of an injunction to restrain unauthorised use is immensely valuable.
However, the court will only grant remedies in relation to the unauthorised use of trade secrets or confidential information if the information has been kept confidential.
Therefore, it is important that businesses protect their trade secrets/confidential information such that they can be relied upon in the unfortunate circumstance where there is or threatened unlawful use of this information.
The requirement that the information is kept secret within the business, whilst also allowing legitimate access to business employees who need access to carry out commercial activities, poses a challenge to businesses.
We set out below, some practical measures which could be taken by businesses to protect sensitive commercial information.
Copyright © 2025 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information
Articles
How the Timing of Hypothetical Negotiation Can Lead to a Higher Premium for Exclusivity
December/January 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.