直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

European IP Blog

A US and EP Comparison on Added Subject Matter

14 July 2023

Authored and Edited by K. Victoria Barker, Ph.D.; Sarah J. Rodriguez

Our recent webinar comparing US and EP approaches to added subject matter was well attended and the number of questions we received in the Q&A clearly showed that added subject matter at the EPO remains a hot topic for attorneys around the world.

Our top tips for minimizing the likelihood of added matter problems at the EPO are:

1. Build-in basis for combinations at the drafting stage

      • Consider adding multiple claim dependencies and/or multiply dependent numbered embodiments

2. Assume the Examples and Figures are merely illustrative

      • Assume that you will not be able to use the Examples and Figures as basis for amendments during prosecution, and build in any key features into the general description when drafting

3. Take care with amendments during prosecution

      • Added matter is frequently fatal at opposition so take the time to stress test claims of important cases prior to grant – there is no presumption of validity at the EPO

A recording of the webinar and a copy of the slides can be found here. If you have any questions on specific added matter problems affecting your patent portfolio, please contact Sarah Rodriguez or Victoria Barker for tailored advice.

Tags

EPO Guidelines, European Patent Office (EPO), subject matter jurisdiction

Related Practices

Prosecution and Portfolio Management

Patent Drafting and Prosecution

Contacts

K. Victoria Barker, Ph.D.
Associate
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2822
Email
Sarah J. Rodriguez
Of Counsel
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2810
Email

Copyright © 2023 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Conference

2027 ABA-IPL Section Annual Meeting – IPLSPRING

April 14-15, 2027

Arlington

Reception

2026 IPO Education Foundation Awards Dinner

December 15, 2026

Washington, DC

Conference

Atlantic Basin Conference on Chemistry 2026

December 6-9, 2026

Rio de Janeiro

Conference

Licensing Executives Society Chinese Taipei – Annual Conference 2026

December 4, 2026

Taipei

Panel Discussion

2026 Advanced Patent Law Institute

December 3-4, 2026

Stanford

Webinar

Data and Market Exclusivity: An Update on China’s New Law and Comparisons to the US and Europe

November 19, 2026

Webinar

Conference

IPBC Asia 2026

November 17-19, 2026

Tokyo

Conference

IAM Live: Trade Secret Strategy USA

November 10, 2026

San Jose

Conference

Broad's 3rd Annual Biotech IP Summit

November 10, 2026

Cambridge

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP