直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

European IP Blog

A US and EP Comparison on Added Subject Matter

14 July 2023

Authored and Edited by K. Victoria Barker, Ph.D.; Sarah J. Rodriguez

Our recent webinar comparing US and EP approaches to added subject matter was well attended and the number of questions we received in the Q&A clearly showed that added subject matter at the EPO remains a hot topic for attorneys around the world.

Our top tips for minimizing the likelihood of added matter problems at the EPO are:

1. Build-in basis for combinations at the drafting stage

      • Consider adding multiple claim dependencies and/or multiply dependent numbered embodiments

2. Assume the Examples and Figures are merely illustrative

      • Assume that you will not be able to use the Examples and Figures as basis for amendments during prosecution, and build in any key features into the general description when drafting

3. Take care with amendments during prosecution

      • Added matter is frequently fatal at opposition so take the time to stress test claims of important cases prior to grant – there is no presumption of validity at the EPO

A recording of the webinar and a copy of the slides can be found here. If you have any questions on specific added matter problems affecting your patent portfolio, please contact Sarah Rodriguez or Victoria Barker for tailored advice.

Tags

EPO Guidelines, European Patent Office (EPO), subject matter jurisdiction

Related Practices

Prosecution and Portfolio Management

Patent Drafting and Prosecution

Contacts

K. Victoria Barker, Ph.D.
Associate
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2822
Email
Sarah J. Rodriguez
Of Counsel
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2810
Email

Copyright © 2023 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Conference

7th International Conference on Biofuels and Bioenergy

June 25-26, 2026

Edinburgh

Conference

2026 Copyright Society Annual Meeting

June 14-16, 2026

Louisville

Seminar

3rd AI, IP, & Legal Forum

June 6, 2026

Shangai

Articles

California Reaches Record $12.75 Million CCPA Settlement with General Motors Over Driver Data

June 4, 2026

Conference

17th Summit on Biosimilars & Innovator Biologics

June 2-3, 2026

New York

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: April 2026

June 1, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions

May 29, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a    
§ 325(d) EPR Denial

May 28, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP