直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

At the PTAB Blog

IPR and CBM Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in May 2016

June 27, 2016

Authored and Edited by David C. Seastrunk; Elliot C. Cook; Daniel F. Klodowski; Aaron L. Parker

In the 35 Final Written Decisions issued by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in May, the Board cancelled 413 (74.28%) of the instituted claims and declined to cancel 94 (16.91%) of the instituted claims. Patent owners conceded 49 (8.81%) of the instituted claims through motions to amend or disclaimer.

PTAB-STATS-Claim-and-Case-Disposition-IPR-Claim-May-Stats

On a per-case basis, no instituted or substitute claims survived in 25 (71.43%) of the decisions, all instituted claims survived in only three (8.57%) of the decisions, and a mixed outcome occurred in seven (20.00%) of the decisions. A mixed outcome occurs where at least one instituted or substitute claim remains patentable, and at least one is cancelled, in a Final Written Decision.

PTAB-STATS-Claim-and-Case-Disposition-IPR-Case-May-Stats

The following resources are also available on the AIA Blog:

  • More detailed cumulative statistics on the Board’s IPR and CBM decisions, updated through April 1, 2016
  • Lists of the top 10 PTAB judges by panel appearances and authored opinions
  • Numbers of final written decisions by technology center

Various other PTAB metrics collected and generated by Finnegan are reserved for the use of Finnegan and its clients.

 

Tags

Final Written Decision

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Contacts

Elliot C. Cook
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2738
Email
Daniel F. Klodowski
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4216
Email
Aaron L. Parker
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4387
Email

Copyright © 2016 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 

DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California

October 19-20, 2026

San Francisco

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York

September 28-29, 2026

New York

Lecture

Resolving Patent Suits Without Settlement Payments

September 3, 2026

Virtual

Conference

13th Annual Summit for Women Leaders in Life Sciences Law

July 29-30, 2026

Boston

Webinar

U.S. Patent Case Law Update 2026

July 23, 2026

Webinar

Conference

2026 China Pharmaceutical Innovation Conference

July 22-24, 2026

Shanghai

Webinar

Successful Strategies to Win Alice Motions and Fee Awards in Patent Cases Against Non-Practicing Entities

July 22, 2026

Webinar

Webinar

Early Motions in Trade Secret Litigation – Offensive and Defensive Insights

July 15, 2026

Webinar

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP