June 1, 2023
Authored and Edited by Daniel F. Klodowski; Umber Aggarwal; Deena Kablaoui Lanier; Elliot C. Cook
In April, a relatively difficult month for patent owners, the PTAB cancelled 524 (86.33%) instituted claims across 43 IPR and PGR Final Written Decisions, including decisions following remand from the Federal Circuit. Only 69 (11.37%) instituted claims survived review, and patent owners conceded 14 (2.31%) instituted claims through motions to amend or disclaimer in cases reaching a final decision. For comparison, the cumulative average cancellation rate of instituted claims in IPR, CBM, and PGR Final Written Decisions is about 72%.

On a per-case basis, no instituted or substitute claims survived in 34 (79.07%) decisions, all instituted claims survived in 3 (6.98%) decisions, and a mixed outcome occurred in 6 (13.95%) decisions. A mixed outcome occurs where at least one instituted or substitute claim remains patentable, and at least one is cancelled, in a Final Written Decision.

Through April 30, 2023, the PTAB has cumulatively granted 600 (16.57%) proposed substitute claims in motions to amend while denying 3,020 (83.43%) proposed substitute claims in IPRs.

The overall cumulative instituted claim survival rate in IPRs, CBMs, and PGRs through April 30, 2023, broken down by technology center, is as follows:

The cumulative number of Final Written Decisions through April 30, 2023, separated by technology center, is as follows:

Additional cumulative statistics on the Board’s IPR, CBM, and PGR decisions, updated through April 30, 2023, are available here on the At the PTAB blog.
Copyright © 2023 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
Hybrid Conference
Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California
October 19-20, 2026
San Francisco
Hybrid Conference
Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York
September 28-29, 2026
New York
Webinar
Early Motions in Trade Secret Litigation – Offensive and Defensive Insights
July 15, 2026
Webinar
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.