November 18, 2016
Authored and Edited by Elliot C. Cook; Daniel F. Klodowski; David C. Seastrunk; Jason E. Stach
Through November 1, 2016, the Federal Circuit decided 128 PTAB appeals from IPRs and CBMs. The Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 101 (78.91%) of the cases, and reversed or vacated the PTAB on every issue in 9 (7.03%) of the cases. A mixed outcome on appeal, where at least one issue was affirmed and at least one issue was vacated or reversed, occurred in 11 (8.59%) of the cases.
The court dismissed 7 (5.47%) of the cases without rendering a decision on the merits. Dismissals may occur, for example, where the Federal Circuit determines that it does not have jurisdiction to hear a case, such as in an appeal from a PTAB institution decision. As the Supreme Court established in Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC v. Lee, the Federal Circuit is barred from considering appeals from institution decisions under 35 U.S.C. § 314(d). Dismissals may also result from settlements among the parties to the appeal, or where the court determines that a prior decision renders a case moot.
An important tool that helps the Federal Circuit manage its growing docket of PTAB appeals is the Rule 36 affirmance, whereby the court affirms the PTAB without rendering a full, written opinion. Of the 128 PTAB appeals it has considered thus far, the Federal Circuit has issued Rule 36 affirmances in 69 (53.91%) of cases. The court issued written opinions, including affirmances, reversals, and mixed decisions, in 59 (46.09%) of its cases.
Breaking down the numbers further, in its appeals from IPRs, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 92 (80.00%) of the cases, reversed or vacated the PTAB on every issue in 9 (7.83%) of the cases, issued a mixed outcome in 10 (8.70%) of the cases, and dismissed 4 (3.48%) of the cases.
In CBM appeals, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 9 (69.23%) of the cases, issued a mixed outcome in 1 (7.69%) case, and dismissed 3 (23.08%) cases. The Federal Circuit has not reversed or vacated the PTAB on every issue in a CBM appeal.
Stay tuned to the AIA Blog for the latest updates, analysis, and statistics on all aspects of PTAB and Federal Circuit practice. Subscribe to the AIA Blog to receive notifications of new posts via email.
Copyright © 2016 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. Additional disclaimer information.
At the PTAB Blog
IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in March and April 2026
May 26, 2026
At the PTAB Blog
May 20, 2026
Webinar
Changes at the PTAB from Settled Expectations to Real Parties in Interest to Director Involvement
May 18, 2026
Webinar
Federal Circuit IP Blog
When “and” and “e.g.” Matter: Federal Circuit Revives VLSI vs. Intel Case
May 14, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Federal Circuit Affirms § 102(b) Invalidity; Source Code Commands Are Not Hearsay
May 14, 2026
Articles
Unpacking Squires’ Recent Discretionary Denial Guidance Focusing on American Manufacturing
April 24, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.