December 16, 2020
Authored and Edited by Y. Leon Lin; Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D.
On December 04, 2020, the PTAB designated as precedential its institution decision in Sharkninja Operating LLC, et al. v. iRobot Corporation, IPR2020-00734, Paper No. 11 (PTAB Oct. 06, 2020).
Patent Owner, iRobot, argued in its Preliminary Response that institution of Petitioner SharkNinja’s IPR petition challenging U.S. Patent No. 9,921,586 should be denied under 35 U.S.C. § 312(a)(2) because the petition failed to name all real parties-in-interest (“RPI”). Specifically, Patent Owner alleged that JS Global Lifestyle is the ultimate corporate parent for all petitioner parties and argued overlapping management demonstrated JS Global Lifestyle’s involvement in the asserted IPR proceeding.
The Board determined that a resolution of the RPI dispute was unnecessary at the institution stage, citing its previous precedential decision in Lumentum Holdings, Inc. v. Capella Photonics, IPR2015-00739, Paper 38 at 6 (PTAB Mar. 4, 2016), that a petition does not require a correct identification of all RPIs if the RPI issue would not affect whether institution should be granted.
In the case at hand, iRobot did not allege that the failure to identify all RPIs would result in the termination of the proceeding or denial of institution of review for any reason other than for the alleged failure of a procedural requirement that can be corrected in a later amendment. Furthermore, the Board found that JS Global Lifestyle was not barred or estopped from joining the proceeding, Petitioner offered to add its parent company if it would avoid the dispute, and there was no evidence that Petitioner purposefully omitted naming JS Global Lifestyle to gain an advantage.
Given these facts, the Board determined that resolution of such non-impactful RPI issues would have been a lengthy exercise that was unnecessary for the purposes of granting or denying institution. Therefore, in the interest of judicial efficiency, the Board refused to consider the RPI issues and granted the institution decision on the basis that SharkNinja showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one claim in its petition.
Copyright © 2020 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
Hybrid Conference
2024 California Intellectual Property Law Institute
October 21-22,2024
San Francisco
Conference
4th Annual Passport to Proficiency on the Essentials of Hatch-Waxman and BPCIA
October 8-24, 2024
Virtual
Conference
2024 Corporate Counsel Women of Color: Career Strategies Conference
October 2-5, 2024
Las Vegas
Hybrid Conference
2024 New York Intellectual Property Law Institute
September 30 - October 1, 2024
New York
Hybrid Conference
2024 Patent Law Institute: Critical Issues & Best Practices
September 30 - October 1, 2024
New York
Seminar
Intellectual Property in the Age of AI: What Do You Own and How Do You Balance Risks?
September 25, 2024
Boston
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.