July 14, 2015
Authored and Edited by Daniel F. Klodowski; Elliot C. Cook; Aaron L. Parker
In the 36 Final Written Decisions issued by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in June, the Board cancelled 446 (86.27%) of the instituted claims, and it held that 47 (9.09%) of the instituted claims were not proven unpatentable by a preponderance of the evidence. Patent owners conceded 24 (4.64%) of the instituted claims through motions to amend.
On a per-case basis, no instituted or substitute claims survived in 26 (72.22%) of the decisions, all instituted claims survived in 5 (13.89%) of the decisions, and a mixed outcome occurred in 5 (13.89%) of the decisions. A mixed outcome occurs where at least one instituted or substitute claim remains patentable, and at least one is cancelled, in a Board decision.
More detailed cumulative statistics on the Board’s IPR and CBM decisions, updated through July 1, 2015, are available here on the AIA Blog.
Copyright © 2015 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. Additional disclaimer information.
Hybrid Conference
Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California
October 19-20, 2026
San Francisco
Hybrid Conference
Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York
September 28-29, 2026
New York
Webinar
Early Motions in Trade Secret Litigation – Offensive and Defensive Insights
July 15, 2026
Webinar
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.