直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Article

Understanding the New Inter Partes Reexamination Standard

March 2012

Full Disclosure Patent Newsletter

By Abhay A. Watwe, Ph.D.

This article by Finnegan attorneys Naveen Modi and Abhay D. Watwe, Ph.D., examines the new standard for initiating an inter partes reexamination, which was introduced in the America Invents Act (AIA) of 2011. Before Congress enacted the AIA, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office used the so-called "substantial new question of patentability" or SNQ standard to determine if a reexamination proceeding is needed. The authors outline the criteria for the previous SNQ standard, detail the new inter partes standard, and outline how it differs from the SNQ standard. The authors conclude that "it is still too early to tell whether the new standard will indeed prove more stringent," but offer some suggestions on how requesters can best ensure their requests are granted.

This article was originally published in the March 2012 issue of Finnegan's Full Disclosure newsletter. 

Related Practices

Ex Parte Reexamination (EPR)

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Abhay A. Watwe, Ph.D.
Of Counsel
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2716
Email

Related Insights

Conference

IAM Live: Navigating the UPC 2026

November 3, 2026

Paris

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York

September 28-29, 2026

New York

Conference

IAM Live: SEP Summit Global 2026

September 9-10, 2026

London

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Webinar

Inventive Step in Europe and the US: Comparing the UPC, EPO and National Approaches

July 8, 2026

Webinar

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Vacates and Remands Infringement and Damages Judgment After Erroneous Verdict Form and Eligibility Analysis

July 8, 2026

Articles

EPR Academy, Part 4 of 6: Choosing Between EPR, IPR, PGR, and Reissue

July 1, 2026

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: May 2026

June 30, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Affirms Noninfringement Ruling in Hatch-Waxman Litigation Based on Claim Construction, Prosecution History Estoppel, and the Disclosure-Dedication Rule

June 26, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP