Of Counsel
Abhay Watwe, Ph.D., focuses on patent prosecution, litigation, and reexaminations related to mechanical, electrical, and digital technologies. He also provides patent infringement and validity opinions.
Abhay has over ten years of experience in preparing and prosecuting utility and design patent applications related to a variety of technologies, including heavy machinery; engines; mechanical assemblies; electronic devices; computer-implemented systems and methods; graphical user interfaces; and telecommunications devices and systems. His practice also includes preparing and providing non-infringement and invalidity opinions on patents related to mechanical, electrical, and digital technologies. Abhay also prepares and prosecutes inter partes review (IPR) petitions in said technology areas before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
Prior to joining Finnegan, Abhay worked at Intel Corporation for ten years. He has extensive experience in the design and validation of microprocessor packages; sockets; central processing units (CPUs) and chipset cooling solutions; printed circuit boards; and design and manufacture of chip packages, substrates, and printed circuit boards. At Intel, Abhay was involved in the design and validation of the first high-volume land-grid-array microprocessor socket and package for desktop computers; design and manufacture of high-density interconnect motherboards for Ultra Mobile PC products; and design and validation of cooling solutions for Itanium(R) microprocessors. Abhay is a co-inventor on six U.S. patents related to cooling technologies for electronic packages. He has also coauthored more than twenty publications, including three handbooks.
1:19-cv-12125, D. Mass., Judges Burroughs, Kelley
IPR2020-00733, -00734, -00735, -00863, PTAB, Judges Grossman, McMillin, Melvin, Saindon, Wieker
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Akzo Fails to “Collect” Reversal of Dow’s Summary Judgement of Noninfringement Akzo Fails to “Collect” Reversal of Dow’s Summary Judgement of Noninfringement
February 16, 2016
At the PTAB Blog
PTAB Finds Service of Complaint Was Proper, Denies IPR Petitions Filed One Day Too Late PTAB Finds Service of Complaint Was Proper, Denies IPR Petitions Filed One Day Too Late
February 3, 2016
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Patentee in IPR Proceedings Must Establish Patentability of Substitute Claims Over All Prior Art of Record—Not Just Art Cited in Institution Decision Patentee in IPR Proceedings Must Establish Patentability of Substitute Claims Over All Prior Art of Record—Not Just Art Cited in Institution Decision
June 29, 2015
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Quantitative Analysis: A Must for Domestic Industry Quantitative Analysis: A Must for Domestic Industry
June 4, 2015
At the PTAB Blog
PTAB Denies Motion to Amend Claims in First IPR Final Written Decision PTAB Denies Motion to Amend Claims in First IPR Final Written Decision
November 26, 2013
"The standout partner is Karthik Kumar while standout associates are Colin Kreutzer, Abhay Watwe, Kai Rajan, Stephanie Ham, and Samir Ismail."
The Legal 500 U.S.
"The standout partner is Karthik Kumar while standout associates are Colin Kreutzer, Abhay Watwe, Kai Rajan, Stephanie Ham, and Samir Ismail."
The Legal 500 U.S.
Media Mention
PTAB Reverses Denial of SharkNinja IPR Request PTAB Reverses Denial of SharkNinja IPR Request
November 18, 2021
Law360Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.