直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Article

Shaping the Path for Working Women Post-COVID

April 22, 2021

By K. Victoria Barker, Ph.D.

On 20 April 2021, Finnegan’s London office hosted a virtual brainstorming event for senior women in the IP profession looking at next steps as we head out of lockdown.

It is difficult to argue that the pandemic has been anything other than disastrous for most working women. Alongside increases in caring responsibilities, women have also suffered more from the remote working environment, reporting higher levels of anxiety and burnout. New research from the University of Stanford even suggests that “Zoom fatigue” is worse for women than men (see here).

As a result, we are experiencing a so-called “she-cession” - a recession that disproportionately affects women. One study in the US by the National Women’s Law Center has found that 2.3 million women have left the workforce during the pandemic, compared with 1.8 million men. A study in the UK by the Women’s Budget Group found that, by June 2020 - barely 3 months into lockdown - only 48% of working women were still working full time hours. These figures suggest that gender equality has been set back by at least a decade by the pandemic.

The focus of our discussion was therefore how to move forward out of lockdown in a way that best supports the women in our teams, and we pondered the following questions:

  • how do we get gender equality back on track?
  • do we want to go back to the “old track”, or do we need a new approach?
  • what can we do as individuals to help support the women in our teams as we transition back to our offices?

There was unanimous agreement that going back to the “old ways” will no longer be possible and that therefore new ways of working needed to be found. Indeed, one breakout room noted that companies should be encouraged to find new ways of working for the benefit of their employees.

Prior to the pandemic, it was a common complaint that flexible working was only available for senior positions. However, since the pandemic has shown that working from home can be just as efficient as working from the office, it is hoped that requests from all colleagues for greater flexibility will be met positively going forwards.

While home working is likely to continue, it was noted that managers should help to set boundaries for employees to help them to maintain a work/life balance. This may be achieved by, for example, not emailing employees or scheduling meetings outside of normal working hours.

The move to virtual formats has been welcomed by many people, allowing attendance at events without the need for travel. As we transition back to our offices, there is concern that these events will go back to being “in person only”, which could again exclude anyone who struggles to find additional time in their day for travel. Similarly, while everyone is remote, virtual meetings are the norm. However, there is concern that as some people head back into their offices and in person meetings start to take over, home working colleagues may get left behind. The group was split, however, on the best way forward. Some felt that one forum should be chosen to ensure a level playing field. For example, all attendees must attend virtually, irrespective of location. Others felt that hybrid events should be encouraged, with options for both virtual and in person attendance.

It was noted that before the pandemic the feedback women received in the workplace was often less actionable than the feedback received by male counterparts. For example, a typical survey of feedback received by employees found that men were advised to develop confidence in a specific skill/area, whilst women were told to be generically more confident. This issue has been compounded by difficulties providing virtual feedback, leading to a “double whammy” on female staff and especially female trainees. It was noted that giving feedback can be more difficult in a virtual format, as body language clues can be harder to read. Additional training for managers in giving virtual feedback is therefore encouraged.   

As we head out of lockdown, it is clear that there is no “one size fits all” solution, and each company and team will need to find their own path. We remain hopeful, however, that the experience of lockdown has proved that new ways of working can be accommodated, maximising accessibility for all colleagues.   

Tags

Finnegan FORWARD, COVID-19

Related Offices

London

Related Professionals

K. Victoria Barker, Ph.D.
Associate
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2822
Email

Copyright © Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.

Related Insights

Conference

IAM Live: Navigating the UPC 2026

November 3, 2026

Paris

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Conference

ChIPs Global Summit 2026

October 21-23, 2026

Los Angeles

Seminar

IAM and WTR Live: Australasia IP Forum 2026

August 11, 2026

Melbourne

Conference

13th Annual Summit for Women Leaders in Life Sciences Law

July 29-30, 2026

Boston

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Vacates and Remands Infringement and Damages Judgment After Erroneous Verdict Form and Eligibility Analysis

July 8, 2026

Articles

When the Classroom Goes Dark: Lessons from the Canvas Breach for Corporate Cyber Preparedness

July 8, 2026

Webinar

Inventive Step in Europe and the US: Comparing the UPC, EPO and National Approaches

July 8, 2026

Webinar

Federal Circuit IP Blog

“2” Does Not Provide Written Description Support for “1”: Federal Circuit Affirms District Court’s Invalidation of Patent

July 8, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP