直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Article

Revisiting Hashtag Trademarks After Ten Years: From Sextiles and Octothorpes to #Metalepsis

September 2020

IP Law Daily

By Robert G. Kramer

From a legal perspective the issue of hashtag trademarks is now a little more than a decade old. It has lost a bit of the excitement it had just five years ago, but it still bears indicia of being a valuable legal and commercial tool. This article attempts to demonstrate why, if deployed correctly, traditional trademark laws and procedures—with only minor modifications—are up to the legal task of registering and enforcing investments in hashtag trademarks on par with other common types of trademarks. In an attempt to answer the question why trademark a hashtag, this article explores the history of hashtag trademarks, the history of the hashtag and then how hashtags use a rhetorical technique called narrative metalepsis (#what?) to help authenticate customer engagements and build brand loyalty with particular goods and services, on and off social media.

Read the full article here.

Tags

social media

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Robert G. Kramer
Special Counsel
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4000
+61 400 025 262
Email

Originally printed in IP Law Daily in September 2020. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm's clients.

Related Insights

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California

October 19-20, 2026

San Francisco

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York

September 28-29, 2026

New York

Conference

13th Annual Summit for Women Leaders in Life Sciences Law

July 29-30, 2026

Boston

Webinar

Successful Strategies to Win Alice Motions and Fee Awards in Patent Cases Against Non-Practicing Entities

July 22, 2026

Webinar

Webinar

Early Motions in Trade Secret Litigation – Offensive and Defensive Insights

July 15, 2026

Webinar

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Vacates and Remands Infringement and Damages Judgment After Erroneous Verdict Form and Eligibility Analysis

July 8, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

“2” Does Not Provide Written Description Support for “1”: Federal Circuit Affirms District Court’s Invalidation of Patent

July 8, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP