April 27, 2018
The National Law Journal
The National Law Journal spoke with partner Erika Arner to discuss the impact of the Supreme Court's decision in SAS Institute v. Iancu. As a result of the decision, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued guidance on how it will handle inter partes review (IPR) proceedings that began under rules that are now no longer applicable. Erika noted that she and her Finnegan colleagues have already started receiving directives in pending IPR reviews. Her perspective is that the PTAB will institute proceedings on all claims and all grounds, but there may be some wiggle room in final written decisions.
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Commentary
Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool
September 25, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027
September 24, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
FORUM IP Talks: Dr. Jochen Herr on UPC, FRAND, and Cross-Border Enforcement Topics
September 20, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.