直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

PTAB Precedential Decision Nomination Form Could Lead to More Controversial Decision-Making Outside of Informal Rulemaking

October 15, 2020

IP Watchdog

In September, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) introduced a new form, which would allow the public to anonymously nominate PTAB decisions for precedential status. The previous process required individuals to submit a written request to the Chief Administrative Patent Judge within 60 days of the final written decision being issued to have the decision considered for precedential status. IP Watchdog interviewed Finnegan partner and leader of the firm’s PTAB Trials Section, Josh Goldberg, for his thoughts on the new form.

Josh said, “Practitioners and stakeholders may disagree as to whether particular precedential or informative decisions are good or bad, but the USPTO’s new form removes barriers that previously prevented some from communicating with the USPTO about such decisions.”

Read the full article here.

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Joshua L. Goldberg
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 202 408 6092
Email

Related News

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Commentary

Fed. Circ. Overrules Precedent on Veteran Hiring Protections

August 14, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP