Eli Lilly & Co. has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review a ruling by the Federal Circuit regarding their patent for Gemzar®, a cancer treatment. The ruling by the Federal Circuit states that Gemzar® was invalid for double patenting by a new “bright-line rule,” which Lilly argues was wrongly applied. The bright-line rule “nulls a second patent's claim to what is not the same as or an obvious variant of a previously claimed invention,” according to Law 360. Lilly states that the application of the bright-line rule improperly transformed the doctrine of double patenting and that a review is needed to set this doctrine right and prevent “the harm caused by the sudden distortion of this once stable area of law.” Lilly is represented by Finnegan.
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Commentary
Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool
September 25, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027
September 24, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
FORUM IP Talks: Dr. Jochen Herr on UPC, FRAND, and Cross-Border Enforcement Topics
September 20, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.