直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Firms Seek ‘Burst of Sunshine’ at ITC After Gloomy Year

November 2, 2023

Managing Intellectual Property

ITC filings were down in 2022, however, some attorneys believe that a recent ruling against Apple shows that the entity may still have its perks. In October, the ITC issued a limited exclusion order against Apple which could ban the tech company from importing Apple Watches into the US due to the possible infringement of two patents from the medical device company Masimo.

Finnegan partner Smith Brittingham told Managing Intellectual Property that owners may feel that the forum is less patent-friendly than it was.

He notes that this is partly down to the number of cases filed by non-practicing entities (NPEs). NPEs often struggle to establish domestic industry, which is one of the requirements for bringing an ITC complaint.

“This case shows that a complainant can still run that gauntlet and get a result, which may encourage people to take a second look at the ITC as a potential venue.”

Smith points out that the patent dispute wasn’t only fought at the ITC but also in court. Masimo has also filed a separate trade secrets suit against Apple related to the same technology.

“This fits within our view that many of the modern large-scale IP disputes are not single forum cases. There needs to be a comprehensive strategy of ITC, district court, and perhaps European litigation,” he said.

“Being able to investigate and work on a range of matters is very important in today’s patent litigation world.”

Smith adds that Finnegan has flexible subject matter expertise among partners. For example, in addition to ITC matters, he also works on district court cases and trade secrets disputes.

“If you get the client in the door, we’ll put together a team that’s able to handle the entire variety of claims and forums, and it wouldn’t feel like separate teams,” he said.

Smith said that Masimo’s relevant commercial product hadn’t come out when it filed its complaint. This raised questions about relying on investments in domestic industry that were in the process of being established.

He notes, however, that this is an open question because there’s not yet a public version of the ITC’s opinion.

Apple and Masimo will be given time to make proposed redactions, a process that could take several weeks.

“They asked a lot of questions that practitioners would love to know the answer to. When we see the public version, we may get a lot of answers,” he said.

Smith notes that Apple tried to argue that the Apple Watches were being used in various studies and had health benefits for consumers. Masimo pushed back on these arguments.

“Those issues will also be discussed, and it will be helpful to understand where the commission’s coming from where there’s a big public interest fight,” said Smith.

Read “Firms Seek ‘Burst of Sunshine’ at ITC After Gloomy Year”

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

ITC Section 337 Investigations and Trials

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Smith R. Brittingham IV
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4158
Email

Related News

Award/Ranking

Forbes Names Finnegan Partner Erika Harmon Arner on its Inaugural 2026 America’s Top Women Lawyers List

June 5, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in 2026 IAM Patent 1000 Guide; Nearly 60 Attorneys Ranked

May 28, 2026

Commentary

Quince Aims to Have ‘Dupe’ Evidence Shape Ugg Shoe Patent Trial

May 26, 2026

Commentary

New Appellate Opinion in Amazon Biometric Data Case May Signal ‘Narrowing’ Scope of BIPA Litigation, Experts Say

May 20, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Partner Antje Brambrink Shortlisted for Women in Business Law EMEA Award

May 13, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination

May 11, 2026

Commentary

ITC Bars Import of Innoscience Chips Made Before Redesign

May 8, 2026

Commentary

How Litigation Funding Disclosure Could Affect ITC Cases

May 7 , 2026

Award/Ranking

61 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2025 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll

May 7, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP