直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Federal Circuit .SUCKS Footnote Could Hinder Repeat Filings

February 9, 2022

Managing Intellectual Property

On February 2, 2022, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) upheld the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s rejection of a ‘.SUCKS’ trademark on the basis that the applied-for mark hadn’t created enough of a commercial impression. The decision has the potential to make it more difficult for applicants of similar marks to reapply for rejected marks. Managing Intellectual Property contacted Finnegan partner Douglas Rettew to discuss the potential implications of the CAFC’s decision.

Doug explained that parties should bring ample evidence to support their claims when applying for trademarks or trying cases in front of the USPTO’s Trademark Trial and Appeals Board (TTAB). He added that, as seen in the ‘.SUCKS’ opinion footnote, the administrative preclusion doctrine could prevent parties from a second attempt at registering. 

Read "Federal Circuit .SUCKS Footnote Could Hinder Repeat Filings"

Tags

preclusion, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Trademark Counseling and Prosecution

Related Industries

Communications

Internet of Things (IoT)

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Douglas A. Rettew
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4161
Email

Related News

Commentary

Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool

September 25, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Commentary

New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret

September 21, 2026

Commentary

FORUM IP Talks: Dr. Jochen Herr on UPC, FRAND, and Cross-Border Enforcement Topics

September 20, 2026

Commentary

Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say

September 17, 2026

Commentary

Jellycat’s ‘Dupe’ Dilemma: Can IP Protect a ‘Cute’ Aesthetic?

September 16, 2026

Commentary

Bloomberg Law Q&A with Finnegan IP Lawyer Christian Hurt

September 11, 2026

Commentary

Uncrustables Fame Ruling Sets Up Functionality Fight Over Crimped Edge

September 11, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP