February 9, 2022
Managing Intellectual Property
On February 2, 2022, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) upheld the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s rejection of a ‘.SUCKS’ trademark on the basis that the applied-for mark hadn’t created enough of a commercial impression. The decision has the potential to make it more difficult for applicants of similar marks to reapply for rejected marks. Managing Intellectual Property contacted Finnegan partner Douglas Rettew to discuss the potential implications of the CAFC’s decision.
Doug explained that parties should bring ample evidence to support their claims when applying for trademarks or trying cases in front of the USPTO’s Trademark Trial and Appeals Board (TTAB). He added that, as seen in the ‘.SUCKS’ opinion footnote, the administrative preclusion doctrine could prevent parties from a second attempt at registering.
Read "Federal Circuit .SUCKS Footnote Could Hinder Repeat Filings"
preclusion, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Commentary
Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool
September 25, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
FORUM IP Talks: Dr. Jochen Herr on UPC, FRAND, and Cross-Border Enforcement Topics
September 20, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Commentary
Uncrustables Fame Ruling Sets Up Functionality Fight Over Crimped Edge
September 11, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.