直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Federal Circuit .SUCKS Footnote Could Hinder Repeat Filings

February 9, 2022

Managing Intellectual Property

On February 2, 2022, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) upheld the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s rejection of a ‘.SUCKS’ trademark on the basis that the applied-for mark hadn’t created enough of a commercial impression. The decision has the potential to make it more difficult for applicants of similar marks to reapply for rejected marks. Managing Intellectual Property contacted Finnegan partner Douglas Rettew to discuss the potential implications of the CAFC’s decision.

Doug explained that parties should bring ample evidence to support their claims when applying for trademarks or trying cases in front of the USPTO’s Trademark Trial and Appeals Board (TTAB). He added that, as seen in the ‘.SUCKS’ opinion footnote, the administrative preclusion doctrine could prevent parties from a second attempt at registering. 

Read "Federal Circuit .SUCKS Footnote Could Hinder Repeat Filings"

Tags

preclusion, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Trademark Counseling and Prosecution

Related Industries

Communications

Internet of Things (IoT)

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Douglas A. Rettew
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4161
Email

Related News

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Commentary

Fed. Circ. Overrules Precedent on Veteran Hiring Protections

August 14, 2026

Award/Ranking

Fourteen Finnegan Attorneys Named to the 2026 IAM Strategy 300 List

August 13, 2026

Commentary

Q&A: What the 'GenAI Boom' Means for Patents

August 6, 2026

Commentary

U.S. Trademark Owners Turn to "Schedule A" as Blocking Bills Bypass Counterfeiting

August 5, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP