直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Press Release

Copyright Victory for Finnegan Client MRIS at the Fourth Circuit

July 25, 2013

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

July 25, 2013

Contact: Margaret A. Esquenet, Partner
margaret.esquenet@finnegan.com

Copyright Victory for Finnegan Client MRIS at the Fourth Circuit 

WASHINGTON, DC - On July 17, 2013, the Fourth Circuit issued its opinion affirming the preliminary injunction issued by Judge Williams in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland in Metropolitan Regional Information Systems, Inc. v. American Home Realty Network, Inc., Case No. 12-cv-0954-AW. The panel’s 3-0 decision sided with firm client Metropolitan Regional Information Systems, Inc. (“MRIS”) on each issue on appeal, including two issues of first impression in any circuit court: (1) the validity of electronic copyright assignments under the “writing requirement” set forth in Section 204 of the Copyright Act and the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (“E-SIGN”) and (2) whether Section 409 of the Copyright Act requires a registrant to list the names of authors and titles for each component work within a compilation.

The Fourth Circuit’s ruling that an electronic agreement may effect a valid transfer of copyright interests under Section 204 of the Copyright Act is the first of its kind, and has significant implications for the validity of electronic transfers in other areas. Regarding the Section 409 issue, the Fourth Circuit’s opinion disagreed with a number of district court cases holding that copyright registrants failed to comply with the requirements of Section 409 by not listing authors of component works in the application to register the compilation. The Fourth Circuit’s opinion will likely be heavily cited by the courts and other owners of copyright in compilations in the future.

About Finnegan

With more than 375 intellectual property lawyers, Finnegan is one of the largest IP law firms in the world. From offices in Washington, DC; Atlanta, Georgia; Boston, Massachusetts; Palo Alto, California; Reston, Virginia; Brussels, Belgium; Shanghai, China; Taipei, Taiwan; and Tokyo, Japan, the firm practices all aspects of patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret law, including counseling, prosecution, licensing, and litigation. Finnegan also represents clients on IP issues related to international trade, portfolio management, the Internet, e-commerce, government contracts, antitrust, and unfair competition. For additional information on the firm, please visit www.finnegan.com.

###

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Trademark and Brand Management

Copyright

Related Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology

Electrical and Computer Technology

Related News

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named a Finalist for The American Lawyer 2026 Industry Awards

August 13, 2026

Award/Ranking

Fourteen Finnegan Attorneys Named to the 2026 IAM Strategy 300 List

August 13, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Climbs Two Spots on The American Lawyer’s 2026: A-List Runners Up

August 12, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Tier 1 Rankings from Managing IP; More than 30 Attorneys Named 2026 IP Stars

July 30, 2026

Press Release

BMW Secures Landmark ITC Victory: ALJ Terminates Zync Investigation Based on Forum-Selection Clause

July 29, 2026

Press Release

Ninth Circuit Denies Zync’s Emergency Motion to Stay; BMW’s Preliminary Injunction Remains in Full Effect as Zync Moves to Stay ITC Proceedings

July 24, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP