August 30, 2013
Life Sciences Intellectual Property Review
This article from LSIPR discusses a recent amici curiae submitted to a U.S. district court in support of Ambry Genetics and Gene by Gene. Finnegan partner Anthony C. Tridico, Ph.D. provided commentary on the patent infringement cases against Myriad Genetics, Inc. and the potential impact of the amici curiae submitted by industry groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), and the Public Patent Foundation (PUBPAT). Tridico said Ambry’s argument that Myriad’s method claims are in breach of the First Amendment is “absolutely not something you see in most cases.” He added, “At this point, the parties are only at the preliminary injunction stage. Since public interest is a factor for preliminary injunctions, [the brief] may be considered by the judge in his determination of the public interest in granting the preliminary injunction.” Tridico also noted that even in light of the amici, “It is still a patent infringement case to be decided on the merits.”
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Commentary
Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool
September 25, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027
September 24, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.