Dr. Antje Brambrink

Et Cetera

• Author. “New decisions in Europe and the US in CRISPR/Cas9 patent dispute”, Comment on EPO and US decisions, Blog post, March 2022.
• Coauthor. “German Federal Constitutional Court paves the way for the UPC”, Comment on the decision of the Federal Constitutional of 23 June 2021 (2 BvR 2216/20; 2 BvR 2217/20) Blog post, July 2021.
• Author. “Eilanträge gegen Zustimmungsgesetz zum Abkommen über ein Einheitliches Patentgericht zurückgewiesen” (“Interim relief sought against the Act Approving the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court dismissed”), Comment on the order of the Federal Constitutional Court of 23/06/2021 – 2 BvR 2216/20, 2 BvR 2217/20 in GRUR-Prax 2021, 489.
• Author. “UK-Unternehmen nach Brexit im Patentnichtigkeitsverfahren nicht von Prozesskostensicherheit befreit” (“No exemption for UK companies to provide security for legal costs in patent security proceedings after Brexit”), Comment on the order of the Federal Patent Court of 15/03/2021 – 3 Ni 20/20, in GRUR-Prax 2021, 413.
• Author. “BGH klärt Anforderungen an neuheitsschädliche Vorwegnahme der Erfindung” (“Federal Supreme Court clarifies requirements for anticipation of invention detrimental to novelty”), Comment on the judgment of the Federal Supreme Court of 06/04/2021 - X ZR 54/19 in GRUR-Prax 2021, 377.
• Author. “Zur Prozesskostensicherheit nach Brexit auch in höherer Instanz” (“Security for legal costs to be provided post-Brexit, also in higher instances”), Comment on the order of the Federal Supreme Court of 01/03/2021 - X ZR 54/19 (BPatG) in GRUR-Prax 2021, 257.
• Author. “Kartellrechtliche Anforderungen an den SEP-Inhaber bei (komplexen) Wertschöpfungsketten” (“Antitrust requirements for the SEP holder in (complex) value chains”), Comment on the order of the Regional Court of Duesseldorf of 26/11/2020 - 4c O 17/19 in GRUR-Prax 2021, 81.
• Author. “FRAND-Einwand des Herstellers und seiner Zulieferer” (“FRAND objection by the manufacturer and its suppliers”), Comment on the judgment of the Regional Court of Mannheim of 18/08/2020 - 2 O 34/19 in GRUR-Prax 2020, 513.
• Author. “Gesetz zum Abkommen über Einheitliches Patentgericht ist nichtig” (“Law on the Unified Patent Court Agreement is and void”), Comment on the order of the Federal Constitutional Court of 13/02/2020 - 2 BvR 739/17 in GRUR-Prax 2020, 184.
• Author. “BGH konkretisiert Bewertungsmaßstab für erfinderische Tätigkeit bei allgemein verfügbaren Werkzeugen” (“Federal Supreme Court specifies assessment standard for inventive step in case of generally available tools”), Comment on the judgment of the Federal Supreme Court of 17/12/2019 - X ZR 115/17 in GRUR-Prax 2020, 235.