直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
John D. Livingstone
Partner
More
vCard
  • 271 17th Street, NW
  • Suite 1400
  • Atlanta, GA 30363-6209
+1 404 653 6449
john.livingstone@finnegan.com john.livingstone@finnegan.com

John D. Livingstone

Partner

  • +1 404 653 6449 +1 404 653 6449
  • john.livingstone@finnegan.com john.livingstone@finnegan.com
  • 271 17th Street, NW
  • Suite 1400
  • Atlanta, GA 30363-6209
  • vCard

John Livingstone is a nationally recognized first-chair trial lawyer focusing on complex pharmaceutical, chemical, and biotechnology patent litigation before U.S. district courts, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. He also serves as lead counsel in post-grant proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). John was resident in Finnegan’s Tokyo office, the managing partner of the firm’s Atlanta office, and currently sits on the firm’s Management and VISION Committees.

John regularly leads litigation teams in district court and ITC proceedings involving complex patent litigation, trade secret misappropriation, and claims related thereto. In addition to his litigation practice, John represents clients in post-grant proceedings before the PTAB and advises clients on a variety of patent matters, including strategic portfolio management and due diligence assessments in connection with mergers and acquisitions and in-licensing opportunities.

 

John routinely lectures about patent law, including as an adjunct professor at Emory University School of Law teaching a course on patent litigation. He has written numerous legal and scientific articles and presents to national and international audiences, including the International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (AIPPI) in Singapore and Seoul; LexisNexis in Shenzhen; Japan Licensing Executive Society (JLES) in Tokyo; Japan Patent Attorneys Association (JPAA) in Tokyo, Osaka, and Shikoku; American Intellectual Property Law Association’s (AIPLA) Chemical Prosecution Bootcamp in Minneapolis and Houston, and Chemical Practice Group meeting in Houston; and Managing Intellectual Property’s (MIP) roundtable in Tokyo.

 

John has been recognized as an “IP Star” and “Patent Star” both nationally and regionally by MIP since 2013 and as a litigation star by Benchmark Litigation. He has ranked among the top U.S. patent lawyers in Legal Media Group’s Guide to the World’s Leading Patent Law Practitioners since 2016. John is recognized by LMG Life Sciences as General Patent Litigator of the Year South, as an Intellectual Property: Life Sciences Star, and for his contributions to “Hatch-Waxman Patent Litigation”. Intellectual Asset Management (IAM) also praised John for his practice in Georgia. He led the litigation teams responsible for the firm’s appellate victory in Kaken Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Bausch Health Care v. Andrei Iancu and district court win in AstraZeneca AB v. Aurobindo Ltd et al., both of which were selected as Impact Cases of the Year at the LMG Life Sciences Awards.

Et Cetera

  • Recipient of a Pro Bono Leadership Award from the Federal Circuit Bar Association, 2012; and recognized for pro bono service contributions by the Charitable and Educational Fund, 2010.
  • Coauthor. “Ovarian Steroids Modulate Responsiveness to Dopamine and Expression of G-Proteins in Lactotropes,” Neuroendocrinology, 1998.

 

Experience

Nissei ASB Co., et al. v. R&D Tool & Engineering Co.

Successfully represented Nissei ASB in a patent infringement, breach of contract, tortious interference with business relations, and trade secret misappropriation litigation related to blow mold machines used to manufacture containers for consumer product packaging.

4:19-cv-00042, W.D. Mo., Judge Kays

Certain L-Tryptophan, L-Tryptophan Products, and Their Methods of Production

Successfully represented Ajinomoto in an ITC investigation and IPR proceedings involving patents related to genetically modified organisms and the use thereof to make commercial quantities of tryptophan.  The ITC’s final determination found the Ajinomoto patents not invalid and infringed, and the ITC issued limited exclusion and cease-and-desist orders barring CJ and other respondents from importing infringing products for sale in the United States. The PTAB denied institution of CJ’s petitions on both challenged patents.

337-TA-1005, ITC, Judges Bullock, Essex
IPR2017-01551, -01698, PTAB, Judges Franklin, Mitchell, Moore, Sawert, Yang

AstraZeneca AB v. Aurobindo Pharma, Ltd.
Successfully represented AstraZeneca in Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) litigation and inter partes review (IPR) proceedings against multiple generic challengers on its Onglyza® and Kombiglyze® XR pharmaceutical drug products. Patent validity upheld in both the district court and parallel IPR proceeding.

1:14-cv-00664, D. Del., Judge Sleet
IPR2015-01340, PTAB, Judges Elluru, Paulraj, Tierney

In re Rosuvastatin Calcium Patent Litigation
Successfully represented AstraZeneca and Shionogi against eight generic ANDA filers related to Crestor®. District court decision affirmed on appeal.

1:08-md-01949, D. Del., Judges Farnan, Stark
10-1460, -1461, -1462, -1463, -1464, -1465, -1466, -1467, -1468, -1469, -1470, -1471, -1472, -1473, Fed. Cir., Judges Mayer, Newman, Plager

Kissei Pharmaceutical Co. v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd.

Successfully represented Kissei and Allergan in district court Hatch-Waxman litigation related to Rapaflo® (silodosin) for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

1:17-cv-01161, D. Del., Judge Stark

Shionogi Pharmaceuticals v. Apotex/Sandoz
Successfully represented Shionogi Pharmaceuticals in multiple ANDA challenges to Orange Book listed patents covering its Doribax® pharmaceutical product.

3:15-cv-00668, D.N.J., Judges Goodman, Sheridan
3:12-cv-07907, D.N.J., Judges Goodman, Hillman, Williams, Wolfson

Kaken Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Bausch Health Care v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. et al.

Successfully led Kaken and Bausch Health Care in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, district court litigation, and Federal Circuit appeal related to patent covering Kaken and Bausch Health Care’s Jublia® (efinaconazole) product for the treatment of onychomycosis.

3:18-cv-13635, D.N.J., Judges Martinotti, Goodman
18-2232, Fed. Cir., Judges Newman, O'Malley, Taranto
IPR2017-00190, PTAB, Judges Mitchell, Franklin, Pollock
IPR2017-01429, PTAB, Judges Mitchell, Franklin, Pollock

 AstraZeneca AB v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA), Inc.
Representing AstraZeneca in Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) litigation against Zydus on its Farxiga® pharmaceutical drug product.

1:18-cv-00664, D. Del., Judge Andrews

Ajinomoto Co., Inc. et al. v. CJ Cheiljedang Corp. et al.
Represented Ajinomoto in the Southern District of New York in litigation involving patents related to genetically modified organisms and the use thereof to make commercial quantities of tryptophan. The case settled following successful representation of Ajinomoto in related inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, an ITC investigation, and a subsequent Federal Circuit appeal.

1:16-cv-03498, S.D.N.Y., Judges Gorenstein, Vyskocil
337-TA-1005, ITC, Judges Bullock, Essex
18-1590, -1629, Fed. Cir., Judges Dyk, Moore, Taranto
IPR2017-01551, -01698, PTAB, Judges Franklin, Mitchell, Moore, Sawert, Yang

AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Shionogi Co. v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Successfully represented AstraZeneca and Shionogi against Watson's attempt to market a 505(b)(2) version of Crestor®.

1:10-cv-00915, D. Del., Judge Stark

Aventis Pharma SA v. Amphastar Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Represented Aventis in litigation relating to Lovenox®.

5:03-cv-00887, C.D. Cal., Judges Pfaelzer, Timlin, Abrams, Larson

Superior Graphite Co. v. TIMCAL S.A., Ltd.
Successfully represented TIMCAL, in a patent litigation involving a method for producing expanded graphite.

1:03-cv-04904, N.D. Ill., Judge Gottschall
1:04-mc-00038, N.D. Ohio, Judge Polster

VLIW Technology, LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
Successfully represented Hewlett-Packard in trade secret misappropriation litigation related to very-long-instruction-word (compiler) technology.

C.A. No. 20069, Del. Ch., Judge Lamb

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC et al.

Leads district court litigation for Novartis against multiple generics related to KISQALI ®, a blockbuster, breakthrough CDK4/6-inhibitor for the treatment of breast cancer.

1:21-cv-00870, D. Del., Judge Hall

Genzyme Corporation et al. v. Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc. et al.

Led Novartis against Genzyme’s multiple patent infringement actions and inter partes review (IPR) proceedings related to recombinant adeno-associated virus vector technology used in Novartis’ blockbuster, breakthrough gene therapy Zolgensma®. The case settled after four patents were invalidated during claim construction, five patents found not literally infringed, and institution of multiple IPRs. 

1:21-cv-01736, 1:23-cv-00554, D. Del., Judge Andrews

AstraZeneca AB v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc.

Represented AstraZeneca in Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) litigation against Zydus on its blockbuster Farxiga® pharmaceutical drug product. After a bench trial, Judge Andrews ruled that the defendant failed to prove that any of the patent claims at issue were invalid due to obviousness, resulting in a complete win for our client. That decision was not ultimately appealed. 

1:18-cv-00664, D. Del., Judge Andrews

Ajinomoto Co., Inc. et al. v. CJ Cheiljedang Corp. et al.

Lead counsel for Ajinomoto in the Southern District of New York in litigation involving patents related to genetically modified organisms and the use thereof to make commercial quantities of tryptophan. The case settled following successful representation of Ajinomoto in related inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, an ITC investigation, and a subsequent Federal Circuit appeal.

1:16-cv-03498, S.D.N.Y., Judges Gorenstein, Vyskocil
337-TA-1005, ITC, Judges Bullock, Essex
18-1590, -1629, Fed. Cir., Judges Dyk, Moore, Taranto
IPR2017-01551, -01698, PTAB, Judges Franklin, Mitchell, Moore, Sawert, Yang

AstraZeneca AB v. Aurobindo Pharma, Ltd.

Successfully represented AstraZeneca in Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) litigation and inter partes review (IPR) proceedings against multiple generic challengers on its Onglyza® and Kombiglyze® XR pharmaceutical drug products. Patent validity upheld in both the district court and parallel IPR proceeding.

1:14-cv-00664, D. Del., Judge Sleet
IPR2015-01340, PTAB, Judges Elluru, Paulraj, Tierney

Kaken Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Bausch Health Care v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. et al.

Successfully led Kaken and Bausch Health Care in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, district court litigation, and Federal Circuit appeal related to patent covering Kaken and Bausch Health Care’s Jublia® (efinaconazole) product for the treatment of onychomycosis.

3:18-cv-13635, D.N.J., Judges Martinotti, Goodman
18-2232, Fed. Cir., Judges Newman, O'Malley, Taranto
IPR2017-00190, PTAB, Judges Mitchell, Franklin, Pollock
IPR2017-01429, PTAB, Judges Mitchell, Franklin, Pollock

More

Insights

Articles

Implications of California's AB 824 Patent Settlement Regulation

Implications of California's AB 824 Patent Settlement Regulation Implications of California's AB 824 Patent Settlement Regulation

May 21, 2025

Life Science Leader

Conference

2024 Corporate IP Institute 2024 Corporate IP Institute

October 29-30, 2024

Atlanta

Seminar

Basel: Life Sciences IP Seminar: Multijurisdictional Considerations for Protecting Your Most Valuable Assets

Basel: Life Sciences IP Seminar: Multijurisdictional Considerations for Protecting Your Most Valuable Assets Basel: Life Sciences IP Seminar: Multijurisdictional Considerations for Protecting Your Most Valuable Assets

May 16, 2024

Basel

Seminar

Copenhagen: Life Sciences IP Seminar: Multijurisdictional Considerations for Protecting Your Most Valuable Assets

Copenhagen: Life Sciences IP Seminar: Multijurisdictional Considerations for Protecting Your Most Valuable Assets Copenhagen: Life Sciences IP Seminar: Multijurisdictional Considerations for Protecting Your Most Valuable Assets

May 14, 2024

Copenhagen

Webinar

Discovery in U.S. Patent Litigation & Managing its Potential Impact in Related Foreign Cases Discovery in U.S. Patent Litigation & Managing its Potential Impact in Related Foreign Cases

January 18, 2023

Webinar

Webinar

Patent Infringement After Duncan Parking Technologies

Patent Infringement After Duncan Parking Technologies Patent Infringement After Duncan Parking Technologies

September 29, 2022

Webinar

More

Professional Recognition

 "John Livingstone brings an international outlook and inspires confidence in his clients as a skilled litigator, prudent counsellor and post-grant proceedings ace."

Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000

“The top name on the fight card locally is John Livingstone, who is also one of the firm’s best Hatch-Waxman Act litigators.”

Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000

“…comfortable in any forum, John Livingstone takes on the toughest life sciences and chemical cases with zeal. Having worked for several years in Finnegan’s Tokyo office, he has cultivated a strong following of Japanese innovators…”

Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000

“… John Livingstone [is] singled out by peers for [his] IP capabilities. Livingstone, former leader of the firm's biotechnology practice in Japan, runs a U.S. district court patent litigation practice that specializes in pharmaceuticals, chemicals, and biotechnology.” 

Managing Intellectual Property IP Stars

“Atlanta's John Livingstone 'always has the best interest of his client in mind.’”

Legal 500 United States

“One client lauded the work of John Livingstone, describing him as ‘a very smart and reliable attorney who shows a deep understanding of internal business documents.’”

Managing Intellectual Property IP Stars

“Livingstone’s practice primarily emphasizes U.S. district court litigation related to pharmaceutical, chemical, and biotechnology. Clients rave about the partner…”

Managing Intellectual Property IP Stars

“Litigator John Livingstone ‘always thinks what is best for his client,’ says a biotech contact.”

Managing Intellectual Property’s IP Stars

“John Livingstone and David Weingarten are other compelling advocates, particularly in the context of major pharmaceutical and biotechnology cases.”

Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000

 "John Livingstone brings an international outlook and inspires confidence in his clients as a skilled litigator, prudent counsellor and post-grant proceedings ace."

Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000

“The top name on the fight card locally is John Livingstone, who is also one of the firm’s best Hatch-Waxman Act litigators.”

Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000

“…comfortable in any forum, John Livingstone takes on the toughest life sciences and chemical cases with zeal. Having worked for several years in Finnegan’s Tokyo office, he has cultivated a strong following of Japanese innovators…”

Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000

“… John Livingstone [is] singled out by peers for [his] IP capabilities. Livingstone, former leader of the firm's biotechnology practice in Japan, runs a U.S. district court patent litigation practice that specializes in pharmaceuticals, chemicals, and biotechnology.” 

Managing Intellectual Property IP Stars

“Atlanta's John Livingstone 'always has the best interest of his client in mind.’”

Legal 500 United States

“One client lauded the work of John Livingstone, describing him as ‘a very smart and reliable attorney who shows a deep understanding of internal business documents.’”

Managing Intellectual Property IP Stars

“Livingstone’s practice primarily emphasizes U.S. district court litigation related to pharmaceutical, chemical, and biotechnology. Clients rave about the partner…”

Managing Intellectual Property IP Stars

“Litigator John Livingstone ‘always thinks what is best for his client,’ says a biotech contact.”

Managing Intellectual Property’s IP Stars

“John Livingstone and David Weingarten are other compelling advocates, particularly in the context of major pharmaceutical and biotechnology cases.”

Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000

News

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in 2026 IAM Patent 1000 Guide; Nearly 60 Attorneys Ranked Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in 2026 IAM Patent 1000 Guide; Nearly 60 Attorneys Ranked

May 28, 2026

Intellectual Asset Management (IAM)

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named a Tier 1 Firm in the 2026 Benchmark Litigation Rankings Finnegan Named a Tier 1 Firm in the 2026 Benchmark Litigation Rankings

October 28, 2025

Benchmark Litigation

Press Release

Finnegan Recognized as a Leading Firm in the 2025 LMG Life Sciences Americas Rankings Finnegan Recognized as a Leading Firm in the 2025 LMG Life Sciences Americas Rankings

October 1, 2025

LMG Life Sciences

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Wins IP Boutique Firm of the Year, Patent Strategy Firm of the Year, and Hatch-Waxman Litigation Firm of the Year – Branded at the 2025 LMG Life Sciences Americas Awards Finnegan Wins IP Boutique Firm of the Year, Patent Strategy Firm of the Year, and Hatch-Waxman Litigation Firm of the Year – Branded at the 2025 LMG Life Sciences Americas Awards

September 5, 2025

LMG Life Sciences

Award/Ranking

Best Lawyers Recognizes 44 Finnegan Attorneys in its 2026 Edition of The Best Lawyers and Ones to Watch Best Lawyers Recognizes 44 Finnegan Attorneys in its 2026 Edition of The Best Lawyers and Ones to Watch

August 21, 2025

Best Lawyers

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Shortlisted for Seven 2025 LMG Life Sciences Americas Awards

Finnegan Shortlisted for Seven 2025 LMG Life Sciences Americas Awards

July 2, 2025

LMG Life Sciences
More

Professional Activities

  • American Bar Foundation
    (Fellow, 2021-present)
  • American Bar Association
  • American Intellectual Property Law Association
  • Federal Circuit Bar Association (Pro Bono Program)
  • Georgia Lawyers for the Arts
    (Board Member)
  • International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property
  • Order of the Coif
  • State Bar of Georgia (Intellectual Property and Technology Law Sections)
Admissions and Education

Admissions

  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
  • Georgia
  • Supreme Court of the United States
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
  • U.S. District Court, N.D. Georgia
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Education

Emory University School of Law
J.D., with honors, 2001
Florida State University
M.S., Biology, 1997
Florida State University
B.S., Biochemistry, 1994

John's Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
Appeals from the PTAB
Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals
Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
Due Diligence
Opinions and Counseling
Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
Branded Hatch-Waxman (ANDA) Litigation and Trials
Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals
ITC Section 337 Investigations and Trials
Patent Litigation and Trials
Pretrial Strategies
Trade Secrets
Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR
Prosecution and Portfolio Management
IP Portfolio Management
Patent Drafting and Prosecution
Patent Reissues
Trade Secrets

John's Industries

Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
Chemical
Manufacturing
Life Sciences
Biologics
Biotechnology
Medical Device and Diagnostics
Pharmaceutical

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP