直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Overview of TTAB Oppositions

August 20, 2008

By Julia Anne Matheson

The attachment below is a brief overview of U.S. trademark opposition proceedings. Oppositions before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”), the judicial arm of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, are somewhat similar to a civil action in court. The party opposing registration of an application files a Notice of Opposition―analogous to a complaint―stating the bases for its opposition. Once filed, the TTAB issues an “institution order” to both parties detailing the discovery and trial schedule for the action along with the due date for the Answer. The Answer is usually a short, plain denial of the allegations in the Notice of Opposition, sometimes followed by affirmative defenses. In some cases, the applicant may counterclaim to seek cancellation of the opposer’s registration(s).

 

Downloadable Files

  • Overview of TTAB Oppositions

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Trademark Litigation and Trials

Trademark and Brand Management

Trademark Oppositions and Cancellations

Copyright © Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm's clients.

Related Insights

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Conference

WIPR Trade Secrets West

May 28, 2026

San Jose

Articles

Colorado Replaces Landmark AI Act: An Overview of the New SB 26-189 Framework

May 26, 2026

Webinar

Changes at the PTAB from Settled Expectations to Real Parties in Interest to Director Involvement

May 18, 2026

Webinar

Webinar

Implementation of Long-Arm Jurisdiction by the UPC Court and German National Courts: Strategic Considerations and Practical Implications

May 12, 2026

Webinar

Charitable

2026 National Inventors Hall of Fame Induction Ceremony

May 7, 2026

Washington, DC

Panel Discussion

Global Patent Strategies & Litigation: An Exclusive Off-the-Record Conversation with Experienced In-House Leaders

May 5, 2026

London

Articles

Choice of Law in Patent Appeals: The Federal Circuit’s Issue-by-Issue Framework

May/June 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Affirms District Court’s Invalidation of Patents Because Inventorship Could Not Be Corrected Without Giving All Inventors Notice and an Opportunity to Be Heard

April 22, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP