直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Accelerated Examination: New Procedures

April 5, 2011

Update – April 22, 2011 – Director Kappos announced that the USPTO’s spending authority for FY 2011 was limited by the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011, and that it had to make significant reductions for the current fiscal year. Track One of the Three-Track program, which would offer expedited patent examination and was scheduled to go into effect on May 4, 2011, was postponed immediately and until further notice.


In response to applicant feedback regarding delays in examination, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has established a new procedure for prioritizing examinations of certain applications. On April 4, 2011, the USPTO issued a new, final regulation in the Federal Register titled, “Changes to Implement the Prioritized Examination Track (Track I) of the Enhanced Examination Timing Control Procedures.”

For an additional fee of $4,000, and if the applicant complies with strict procedural requirements, the USPTO will expedite examination of any utility or plant application filed on or after May 4, 2011, and hopes to provide a final disposition within 12 months of granting prioritized status. “Final disposition” means mailing of a notice of allowance, mailing of a final office action, filing of a notice of appeal by the applicant, declaring an interference, filing of a request for continued examination by the applicant, or abandoning the application. Because the USPTO includes mailing of a final office action in “final disposition,” applicants may wish to enter the program with a very clear understanding of the scope of allowable claims over the prior art and to request an early interview with the Examiner to advance prosecution.

In order to participate in the program, the application must be complete on filing and must be filed electronically (unless it is a plant application). The USPTO also limits the number of claims in a Track I application to four independent claims and 30 dependent claims, and does not allow multiple dependent claims. If an applicant files a petition for extension of time, a request for continued examination, a request for suspension of action, or an amendment that would increase the number of claims beyond the limits set in the program, the application loses its special status. The special status does not apply to applications during an interference or appeal.

The USPTO will only accept 10,000 applications into this program during the remainder of fiscal year 2011.

Copyright © Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm's clients.

Related Insights

Panel Discussion

2026 Advanced Patent Law Institute

December 3-4, 2026

Stanford

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York

September 28-29, 2026

New York

Virtual Seminar

2026 ACC SFBA IP Symposium

September 17, 2026

Virtual

Webinar

PTAB Developments and Their Impact on Parallel Litigation: Strategic Considerations

August 26, 2026

Webinar

Webinar

A Year of Change for Post-Grant Patent Challenges: Key PTAB and CRU Developments, and Strategic Implications

August 19, 2026

Webinar

At the PTAB Blog

IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in June and July 2026

August 19, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Squires Issues Precedential Decision Clarifying Obviousness-Type Double Patenting Rejections

August 17, 2026

Articles

Privacy Law Mid-Year Update: Key EU and UK Data Protection Decisions

August 13, 2026

European IP Blog

UPC Action Permissibly Lodged Prior to the Grant of a European Patent

12 August 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP