直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 我们的专业人员
  • 服务
  • 我们的见解
  • 办公室
  • 事务所
  • 人才招聘
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • 联邦巡回法院知识产权博客
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First博客
  • Events & Webinars
  • 知识产权讯息
  • 播客
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Seminar

Opposition and Appeal Procedures at the European Patent Office: What Every U.S. Practitioner Should Know

December 2, 2015

Menlo Park, CA

The post-grant opposition procedure at the European Patent Office (EPO) is a powerful tool. More than two-thirds of European patents that are opposed end up being either narrowed in scope or revoked entirely. With applicants from the United States receiving the most European patent grants, understanding how the EPO opposition procedure works, from both offensive and defensive perspectives, will form a key part of any U.S. practitioner’s international patent strategy.

Developing consistent strategies and knowing how to take advantage of both the similarities and the differences between EPO oppositions and U.S. post-grant challenges can give rise to time and cost efficiencies, while ensuring consistent and optimized strategies in each jurisdiction. Please join Finnegan’s European Patent Attorneys as they discuss the following topics and provide practical tips and insights:

  • Opposing: When, how, and what to file; grounds of opposition; admissibility/institution; late submissions; official fees and timescales
  • Responding: How to defend against an opposition; when to file counter-arguments and/or narrowing claim amendments; auxiliary requests; timescales
  • Oral Proceedings: Summons to oral proceedings; preparing final written submissions ahead of oral proceedings; what happens on the day and how to prepare; submitting new requests; delivery of the decision
  • Appeals: When and how to challenge an adverse decision; notice and grounds of appeal; nature of appeals; parties to appeals; official fees and timescales; reformatio in peius; Enlarged Board of Appeal
  • U.S. Post-Grant Procedures: A compare and contrast of EPO oppositions with post-grant review (PGR) and inter partes review (IPR) proceedings; coordinating post-grant proceedings at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and EPO

Speakers:
M. Paul Barker
Aaron J. Capron
Philip L. Cupitt, Ph.D.
Martin D. Hyden

Date:
Wednesday, December 2, 2015

Time:
1:15 - 1:30 p.m. – Registration
1:30 - 4:30 p.m. – Seminar
4:30 - 5:30 p.m. – Reception

Location:
Menlo Park, CA

Related Practices

意见及咨询

知识产权申办及组合管理

Related Industries

制药

生物制剂

生物技术

Related Professionals

Aaron J. Capron
合伙人
Palo Alto, CA
+1 650 849 6680
Email

Related Insights

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Lecture

Resolving Patent Suits Without Settlement Payments

September 3, 2026

Virtual

Webinar

U.S. Patent Case Law Update 2026

July 23, 2026

Webinar

Webinar

Successful Strategies to Win Alice Motions and Fee Awards in Patent Cases Against Non-Practicing Entities

July 22, 2026

Webinar

Webinar

Inventive Step in Europe and the US: Comparing the UPC, EPO and National Approaches

July 8, 2026

Webinar

Federal Circuit IP Blog

“2” Does Not Provide Written Description Support for “1”: Federal Circuit Affirms District Court’s Invalidation of Patent

July 8, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics for March–May 2026

July 2, 2026

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: May 2026

June 30, 2026

Articles

How Low Can You Go? Courts Lower Marking Defense Burden, Raising Patent Damages Risks

June 29, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 隐私
  • 免责申明
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP