直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 弁護士等
  • 業務内容
  • 論文等
  • オフィス
  • 事務所概要
  • 採用情報
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • CAFC控訴審関連ブログ
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • 出願関連ブログ
  • Events & Webinars
  • 知財最新ニュース
  • ポッドキャスト
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Europe’s New Unified Patent Court—How Much Will It Cost? Now We Know

March 1, 2016

By Philip L. Cupitt, Ph.D.; Leythem A. Wall

Europe’s new patent system, expected to come into force in 2017, consists of two parts. First, patent owners will have the option to apply for a European Patent with Unitary Effect (or 'unitary patent' for short) to avoid the costs of validating the patent in individual countries. It will remain possible to apply for a European patent under the current system, which requires validation in individual countries of choice. Second, a new court known as the Unified Patent Court (UPC) will be created to act as a single forum for disputes relating to unitary patents. The UPC will also have jurisdiction to hear disputes relating to European patents granted under the current system, although it will be possible for such patents to be opted out of the UPC's jurisdiction.

Following a public consultation launched in May 2015, the Preparatory Committee for the UPC agreed on the long-awaited Rules on Court fees and recoverable costs at its meeting on 24 and 25 February 2016. The Rules and list of fees can be found here.

Key aspects of the UPC fees include:

  • There will be no fee for opting out European patents from the jurisdiction of the UPC. Likewise, there will be no fee for withdrawing an opt-out. This news will come as a relief to patentees, particularly those with large portfolios.
  • All actions will carry a fixed fee, whilst infringement actions valued above 500,000 EUR will also carry a value-based fee.
  • The fixed fee for an infringement action will be 11,000 EUR. The value-based fees for infringement actions will range from 2,500 EUR (for an action valued between 500,000 and 750,000 EUR) to 325,000 EUR (for an action valued above 50,000,000 EUR).
  • Revocation actions will carry a fixed fee of 20,000 EUR. No value-based fee will be payable. Counterclaims for revocation, however, will carry the same fee as the infringement action, up to a limit of 20,000 EUR.
  • Appeal fees will be the same as the fees payable at first instance.
  • Small and micro entities will be entitled to a 40% reduction on all Court fees. Parties who wrongly claim small or micro entity status can be ordered to pay the remainder of the fees plus a 50% surcharge.
  • Partial reimbursements of Court fees will be available for any party when an action is withdrawn or settled. A 60% reimbursement will be available if the action is withdrawn or settled before the end of the written procedure, with the reimbursement falling to 20% if the action is withdrawn or settled before the end of the oral procedure. A 25% reimbursement is available if an action is heard by a single judge.
  • The costs that a successful party can recover from an unsuccessful party will be subject to ceilings ranging from 38,000 EUR (for actions valued up to 250,000 EUR) to 2,000,000 EUR (for actions valued above 50,000,000 EUR). However, there will be flexibility on recoverable costs, including the ability to go above the stated ceilings by up to 50% on lower value cases.

Guidelines for the determination of Court fees and the ceiling of recoverable costs of the successful party have also been published. These suggest approaches for valuation of actions such as infringement claims, claims and counterclaims for revocation, declarations of non-infringement, actions for compensation of license of right, and applications for interim relief. The Guidelines can be found here.

While it remains to be seen just how the Court will develop, it is clear that the UPC fees will be cheaper than the total of those for parallel litigation in multiple jurisdictions. The threat of recoverable costs (i.e., the ‘loser pays’ principle) may discourage weak cases, whilst partial reimbursements of fees may promote early settlement. Reduced fees will also be encouraging for small and micro-entities. However, compared to the European Patent Office (EPO) opposition fee, currently set at 775 EUR, the UPC revocation fee may seem disappointingly high.

To read more about the UPC, please visit finnegan.com/unifiedpatentcourt.

 

Tags

European Union (EU), Unified Patent Court (UPC), court fees, European Patent Office (EPO)

Related Practices

グローバルな知的財産権利の執行、訴訟、および裁判

単一特許制度(UPS)・統一裁判所(UPC)

Copyright © Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm's clients.

Related Insights

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Conference

2026 AIPLA Annual Meeting

October 29-31, 2026

Washington, DC

Conference

2026 EDTX Bench Bar Conference

October 28-30, 2026

Fort Worth

Conference

ChIPs Global Summit 2026

October 21-23, 2026

Los Angeles

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California

October 19-20, 2026

San Francisco

Conference

31st Annual UMass Chan Research Retreat

October 14-15, 2026

Worcester

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York

September 28-29, 2026

New York

Conference

2026 IPO Annual Meeting

September 27-29, 2026

Toronto

Conference

IAM Live: SEP Summit Global 2026

September 9-10, 2026

London

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • プライバシー
  • 免責事項
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP