Associate
Taylor Stark focuses on district court pre-litigation and litigation matters, proceedings before the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and patent prosecution and portfolio management related to a wide array of technologies, including those related to food and beverage, pharmaceutical, additive manufacturing, mechanical cooling, and search engine technologies. She has technical experience with various stages of alcoholic beverage production, including quality control and regulatory compliance.
Taylor principally engages in pre-litigation and litigation matters in both patent and trade secret law as well as administrative proceedings—such as inter partes review (IPR) proceedings—before the PTAB. She relies on her significant and continuing experience with patent prosecution and portfolio management to inform successful litigation strategies.
Taylor served as a legal intern for the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), where she acquired significant insight into regulatory disclosures and other aspects of information management as well as federal policymaking and implementation.
Taylor previously worked as a quality assurance analyst at Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV's Williamsburg Brewery. Her hands-on experience with the finer details of production in view of corporate specifications and federal regulatory requirements allowed her to materially contribute to administrative matters and training of company managerial and hourly personnel.
Taylor is committed to her pro bono practice in immigration law and supports efforts to obtain asylum for political refugees. She has been recognized on the Capital Pro Bono High Honor Roll.
Bausch Health Ireland Limited et al. v. Aurobindo Pharma Limited et al.
Represented Bausch Health et al. in Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) litigation involving Trulance® (plecanatide) tablets for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome and chronic idiopathic constipation, resulting in favorable settlement post-trial.
2:23-cv-00170, D.N.J., Judge Chesler
1:21-cv-00611, D. Del., Judge Stark
1:22-cv-00085, N.D.W. Va., Judge Kleeh
2:21-cv-00573, W.D. Pa., Judges Cercone, Hardy
1:22-cv-00020, N.D.W. Va., Judge Kleeh
2:21-cv-10057, D.N.J., Judge Chesler
2:21-cv-10403, D.N.J., Judge Chesler
2:23-cv-03333, D.N.J., Judge Chesler
1:24-cv-00036, N.D.W. Va., Judge Kleeh
2:24-cv-07182, D.N.J., Judge Chesler
2:24-cv-11179, D.N.J., Judge Chesler
1:25-cv-00003, N.D.W. Va., Judge Kleeh
IPR2023-00016, PTAB, Judges Hardman, Hulse, Valek
IPR2022-00722, - 01102, -01103, -01104, -01105, PTAB, Judges Hardman, Hulse, Snedden, Valek
Finnegan represented Emergy, Inc., d/b/a Meati Foods in a trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, and correction of inventorship case against The Better Meat Company (BMC) and Augustus Pattillo involving alternative meat made from mycelium.
Emergy alleged that Augustus Pattillo stole its trade secrets on the cultivation and production of mycelium that he learned while working as a lab technician for Emergy’s founders, misused them in his work with BMC, breached his nondisclosure agreement with Emergy, and improperly filed patent applications on Emergy’s technology and assigned them to BMC.
BMC filed claims of tortious interference and unfair competition against Emergy, which Emergy succeeded in striking under California’s anti-Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP) statute. After prevailing under the anti-SLAPP statute, Emergy was statutorily entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs for defending against BMC’s stricken claims of tortious interference and unfair competition
Early in the litigation, Emergy defeated BMC’s motion to dismiss Emergy’s trade secret misappropriation and breach of implied contract claims. Emergy later defeated BMC’s motion for summary judgment on Emergy’s trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, and breach of implied contract claims. The case settled soon after the Court issued its summary judgment ruling.
2-21-cv-02338, E.D. Cal., Judge Mueller
2-21-cv-02417, E.D. Cal., Judge Mueller
R2 Solutions LLC v. FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.
4:21-cv-00940, E.D. Tex., Judge Mazzant
22-156, Fed. Cir., Judges Dyk, Reyna, Taranto
IPR2022-01405, -01456, -01457, PTAB, Judges Iftikhar, Kahn, Parvis
Articles
2024: A Year of Trade Secret Cases in Review 2024: A Year of Trade Secret Cases in Review
January 13, 2025
LES InsightsAt the PTAB Blog
Sniffs of Patentability in IPR: Anticipation, Obviousness, and Admissibility Sniffs of Patentability in IPR: Anticipation, Obviousness, and Admissibility
April 13, 2023
Prosecution First Blog
Giving a Little Grace with Reference Points Giving a Little Grace with Reference Points
March 10, 2023
At the PTAB Blog
References Cited in IDSs but Not Discussed by Examiners May Get Petitioners over the Hurdle of Institution Denial References Cited in IDSs but Not Discussed by Examiners May Get Petitioners over the Hurdle of Institution Denial
December 15, 2022
Articles
Surviving Written Description Challenges to Therapeutic Claims Surviving Written Description Challenges to Therapeutic Claims
November 9, 2022
The Marker/Start IsraelProsecution First Blog
R2 Saves the Day: You Gotta Release and Remove R2 Saves the Day: You Gotta Release and Remove
August 19, 2022
Media Mention
Fed. Circ. Chief Feels 'Bright-Line Rule Coming' for IP Marking Fed. Circ. Chief Feels 'Bright-Line Rule Coming' for IP Marking
April 9, 2026
Law360Media Mention
Federal Circuit Grills Sanctioned Patent Lawyer Over Conduct Federal Circuit Grills Sanctioned Patent Lawyer Over Conduct
April 9, 2026
Bloomberg LawAward/Ranking
56 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2024 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll 56 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2024 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll
April 24, 2025
DC BarDue to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.