Of Counsel*
Shahin Rezvani is a seasoned litigator with more than 25 years of experience handling high-stakes intellectual property (IP), antitrust, class action, and complex commercial disputes. He has represented plaintiffs and defendants in federal and state courts, administrative proceedings, and arbitrations, managing matters from discovery and dispositive motions through trial and post-trial proceedings. Shahin has extensive courtroom experience, including multiple multi-month jury trials, and has taken or defended more than 200 witnesses in patent, copyright, trade secret, antitrust, securities, employment, and contract matters.
Shahin’s IP experience includes disputes involving wireless communications, smartphones and other consumer electronics, semiconductor technologies, computer memory, trademarks, copyrights, and internet domain names. His notable trial work includes helping secure over $100 million patent infringement verdict, defending against a multi-billion-dollar antitrust claim, and contributing to proceedings in which patents covering semiconductor memory technologies were rendered unenforceable. Shahin has also obtained favorable results through summary judgment, judgment as a matter of law, jurisdictional dismissals, and negotiated resolutions. In one expedited arbitration concerning a power generation facility, his work with expert witnesses contributed to an award that enabled facility modifications associated with over half a billion dollars in additional revenue.
In addition to his IP practice, Shahin has prosecuted and defended consumer fraud, data breach, accessibility, securities, and competition-related claims. He obtained a seven-figure settlement in a trademark and unfair competition dispute for a corporate client, as well as a seven-figure settlement in an accessibility class action.
Micron Technology, Inc. v. Rambus Inc.*
Obtained a ruling after a one-week court trial at the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware that Rambus, the owner of patents covering synchronous dynamic random-access memory (SDRAM) and double data rate (DDR) SDRAM memory could not enforce its patents against Micron. Rambus had claimed billions in damages. The court ruled Rambus could not enforce its patents because it had spoliated evidence and acted in bad faith.
D. Del., Judge Robinson
Rambus Inc. v. Micron Technology, Inc. et al.*
Successfully defended Micron in a true "bet-the-farm" antitrust case involving synchronized dynamic random access memory (SDRAM) and double data rate (DDR) SDRAM memory during a three-month jury trial in San Francisco Superior Court. Rambus asserted claims for violations of the Cartwright Act and sought $4 billion in compensatory damages, trebled to $12 billion under the Cartwright Act, as well as other relief. The jury rejected Rambus’s claims and awarded no damages.
Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Francisco, Judge McBride
Freedom Wireless v. Boston Communications Group et al.*
Won a verdict of $128 million for Freedom Wireless in a 12-week patent trial against several cellular carriers. The jury concluded Freedom's patents on prepaid cellular telephone technology were valid and infringed.
D. Mass., Judge Harrington
Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences v. Luft*
Copyright infringement case for the Academy which recovered the "Oscar©" statuette awarded to Judy Garland, preventing its sale to a third-party. At summary judgment, the Court agreed the defendant violated the Academy's display right in the statuette by showing it to prospective buyers.
C.D. Cal., Judge Collins
*Admitted in California only; not admitted in Virginia.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.