直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

IP Update

Reversal of Certain Artificial Intelligence Export Control Rules

May 19, 2025

By Soniya D. Shah; Ming-Tao Yang

On May 13, 2025, the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) rescinded several aspects of the previously approved artificial intelligence (AI) diffusion rules. BIS also announced additional measures regarding semiconductors.

The previous AI diffusion rules, released on January 15, 2025, introduced a three-tiered structure for managing AI chip exports, with (1) little restrictions on the first-tier allies, (2) moderate restrictions on countries listed in the second tier, and (3) significant restrictions on countries listed under the third tier. Rescinding these restrictions immediately before they were scheduled to become effective on May 15, 2025, means elimination of such three-tier system.

BIS explained that the previous AI diffusion rules would have been too burdensome on certain companies, stifling American innovation and undermining diplomatic relationships with countries in the second tier.

As a result, none of January 2025 AI diffusion rules will be enforced while BIS and the Department of Commerce work on replacement rules. However, BIS continues to restrict China’s access to advanced chips and technology.

In addition to rescinding the AI diffusion rules, BIS announced additional actions to strengthen export controls for AI chips, including:

  1. Issuing guidance to the AI industry regarding the risk of using China’s advanced computing integrated circuits and specifically calling out the Huawei Ascend chips. BIS reminds the AI industry that violating export control regulations could result in criminal and administrative penalties.
  2. Issuing guidance warning the public about potential consequences of allowing U.S. AI chips to be used in training and interference of Chinese AI models. The guidance indicated there was leeway to obtain BIS authorization to engage in specific transactions or activities, but failure to obtain such authorization could result in civil or criminal enforcement actions. The guidance also aims to protect national security, including assisting with training AI models for military uses for parties headquartered in Country Group D:5, including China and Macau.
  3. Issuing guidance to U.S. companies about protecting supply chains against diversion tactics, identifying red flags companies to watch out for, and outlining due diligence measures to take.

BIS makes clear that it remains diligent in protecting U.S. national security and foreign policy interests, especially with its further guidance.

Related Practices

Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions

Export Control

Related Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology

Electronic Devices and Components

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML)

Related Offices

Palo Alto, CA

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Soniya D. Shah
Associate
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4204
Email
Ming-Tao Yang
Partner
Palo Alto, CA
+1 650 849 6783
Email

Copyright © Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.

Related Insights

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Affirms Noninfringement Ruling in Hatch-Waxman Litigation Based on Claim Construction, Prosecution History Estoppel, and the Disclosure-Dedication Rule

June 26, 2026

Articles

COPPA’s Amended Rule Is Now in Full Effect: What Operators Need to Know

May 15, 2026

Webinar

The Quantum Leap: Patent Strategies for the Next Era of Computing, Communications, and Beyond

March 18, 2026

Webinar

Articles

A nuclear power plant at sunset with cooling towers emitting steam, overlaid with transparent digital interface graphics and data icons representing technology and analytics.

When Export Controls Meet IP: Lessons from Westinghouse v. KEPCO

January/February 2026

Webinar

U.S. Export Control—A Shifting Landscape for AI, Semiconductor, and Other Techs – Asia audience

December 11, 2025

Webinar

Webinar

U.S. Export Control—A Shifting Landscape for AI, Semiconductor, and Other Techs - US audience

December 3, 2025

Webinar

Articles

Thumbnail-Oddity-of-Examination-of-Certain-Corporate-Witnesses-in-the-U.S.-v.-Germany

Oddity of Examination of Certain Corporate Witnesses in the U.S. v. Germany

November 7, 2025

Articles

EPO Referral May Shift Patent Description Amendment Rules

November 4, 2025

Articles

Understanding Chinese Customs IP Enforcement for Non-Chinese Stakeholders: An Overview of China’s Customs Intellectual Property Protection Practices

October 28, 2025

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP