直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Webinar

Strategic Patent Prosecution: Lessons Learned from Litigation

January 8, 2015

Webinar

View Webinar

The outcome of a U.S. patent litigation often turns on decisions that were quietly made many years before the courtroom drama—by patent attorneys drafting claims and prosecuting an application. The choice of words used in the claims and specification, statements made to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), as well as the selection of prior art submitted, can all have a profound effect on the patentee’s ability to prove infringement, obtain relief, and withstand challenges to the patent’s validity.

Poorly drafted patents are now easily challenged at the USPTO under the America Invents Act (AIA) procedures. And all too frequently, even patents that find their way into the courtroom are construed much more narrowly than the patentee may have intended or, worse, invalidated under the courts’ evolving interpretations of the statutory requirements for patentability.

This webinar reveals lessons learned from litigating patents that will assist you in drafting and prosecuting patent applications to avoid common pitfalls and more effectively achieve your intellectual property objectives. The speakers will focus on actual examples from court decisions to illustrate how patents are interpreted, enforced, and scrutinized in today’s litigation environment, and how altering your patent prosecution strategies can better prepare your patents for their day in court.

Topics will include:

  • Claim drafting strategies that:
    • eliminate certain defenses of accused infringers;
    • simplify proof of infringement and maximizing damages rewards; and
    • avoid patent eligibility limitations under Section 101.
  • Prosecution strategies that:
    • avoid double patenting pitfalls;
    • preserve protection under the doctrine of equivalents; and
    • ensure compliance with your duty of disclosure.

This webinar is the first in Finnegan’s winter 2015 series, “Strategic U.S. Intellectual Property Webinars for Asian Counsel.”

Moderator:

Naoki Yoshida

Speakers: 
York M. Faulkner
Rajeev Gupta, Ph.D.

Date:
Thursday, January 8, 2015

Time:

7:30 - 8:30 a.m. India
10:00 - 11:00 a.m. China/Taiwan
11:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. Japan/Korea

 

Tags

claim construction, United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), America Invents Act (AIA)

Downloadable Files

  • Webinar: Strategic Patent Prosecution: Lessons Learned from Litigation

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Pretrial Strategies

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

Prosecution and Portfolio Management

Patent Drafting and Prosecution

IP Portfolio Management

Related Professionals

Rajeev Gupta, Ph.D.
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4352
Email
Naoki Yoshida
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 6057
Email

Related Insights

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Conference

7th International Conference on Biofuels and Bioenergy

June 25-26, 2026

Edinburgh

Charitable

Bridges From School to Work Gala 2026

June 22, 2026

Washington, DC

Conference

IPBC Global 2026

June 15-17, 2026

San Diego

Conference

17th Summit on Biosimilars & Innovator Biologics

June 2-3, 2026

New York

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: April 2026

June 1, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions

May 29, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a    
§ 325(d) EPR Denial

May 28, 2026

Articles

Colorado Replaces Landmark AI Act: An Overview of the New SB 26-189 Framework

May 26, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP