直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Webinar

U.S. Court Decisions Impacting Drafting and Prosecution of Today’s Patent Applications That Will Become Tomorrow’s Patents

November 4, 2020

Webinar

View Webinar

In the U.S., patent applicants face numerous difficulties in obtaining allowance of claims having a scope adequate to provide a meaningful degree of protection. After a patent is granted, validity challenges arise in various post-grant proceedings at the USPTO and through traditional litigation channels. Even if a patent withstands a validity attack, U.S. court decisions provide numerous examples of patent claims being construed narrowly, often due to missteps that arose when a patent application was drafted or prosecuted. With so many potential pitfalls, patent applicants need to act during drafting and prosecution to strengthen their applications so they survive. This means particular attention needs to be paid to drafting the patent application and prosecuting the application to obtain a patent that will withstand scrutiny.

Join us for a discussion of recent case law that impacts drafting and prosecuting patent applications. Topics to be discussed include:

  • Application drafting tips and considerations in view of recent U.S. court decisions
  • Prosecution strategies to withstand third party validity challenges
  • Claim drafting strategies across various technology fields to enhance the scope of patent protection and avoid unduly narrow claim scope

Recorded: View On Demand

Moderator:
Ningling Wang

Speakers:
Adriana L. Burgy
Anthony M. Gutowski

Tags

District Court, patent application, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), validity

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

Prosecution and Portfolio Management

Patent Drafting and Prosecution

Related Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology

Electrical and Computer Technology

Related Professionals

Adriana L. Burgy
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4345
Email
Anthony M. Gutowski
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2774
Email
Ningling Wang
Partner
Shanghai
+86 21 6194 2005
Email

Related Insights

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Lecture

Resolving Patent Suits Without Settlement Payments

September 3, 2026

Virtual

Webinar

U.S. Patent Case Law Update 2026

July 23, 2026

Webinar

Webinar

Successful Strategies to Win Alice Motions and Fee Awards in Patent Cases Against Non-Practicing Entities

July 22, 2026

Webinar

Federal Circuit IP Blog

“2” Does Not Provide Written Description Support for “1”: Federal Circuit Affirms District Court’s Invalidation of Patent

July 8, 2026

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: May 2026

June 30, 2026

Articles

How Low Can You Go? Courts Lower Marking Defense Burden, Raising Patent Damages Risks

June 29, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Affirms Noninfringement Ruling in Hatch-Waxman Litigation Based on Claim Construction, Prosecution History Estoppel, and the Disclosure-Dedication Rule

June 26, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Mere Invalidity of Asserted Claims Does Not Render Patent Infringement Case Exceptional or Warrant Sanctions

June 26, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP