直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Prosecution First Blog

Product Launch Pitfalls Following the America Invents Act

March 22, 2013

Authored and Edited by Elizabeth D. Ferrill

The 2013 Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas had 3,300 exhibitors displaying an estimated 20,000 new products. Many will not be for sale for many months, but were previewed at the CES for public consumption. Harvard Business Review reports that successful product launches require entrepreneurs to perform market research and independent testing and to educate sales channels and consumers. A recent article in Inc. Magazine agrees.

Trade shows, market research, and consumer education all have one thing in common: public disclosure of the product design at issue. But, long gone are the days when a company could “preview” its product design at an annual meeting or trade show, tweak the design, launch its product months later, and still rely on the one-year grace period of 35 U.S.C. 102(b) to file design patent applications to protect its innovative work.

Under the “first-inventor-to-file” regime of the America Invents Act, effective March 16, 2013, public disclosure of a complete product design without filing for a design patent protection beforehand  may be giving that design away to competitors. While the AIA includes a limited grace period for certain disclosures, this grace period is a far cry from the pre-AIA one-year period that permitted public use or sale of a design prior to filing a patent application.

Under these new rules it seems likely that many more products at CES 2014 will be patent pending…that is design patent pending.

Tags

First to file (FTF)

Contacts

Elizabeth D. Ferrill
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4445
Email

Copyright © 2013 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 

DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. Additional disclaimer information. 

Related Insights

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Conference

2026 Copyright Society Annual Meeting

June 14-16, 2026

Louisville

Charitable

TopGolf for the Troops 2026

June 11, 2026

Ashburn

Seminar

3rd AI, IP, & Legal Forum

June 6, 2026

Shangai

Articles

California Reaches Record $12.75 Million CCPA Settlement with General Motors Over Driver Data

June 4, 2026

Conference

17th Summit on Biosimilars & Innovator Biologics

June 2-3, 2026

New York

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: April 2026

June 1, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a    
§ 325(d) EPR Denial

May 28, 2026

Articles

Colorado Replaces Landmark AI Act: An Overview of the New SB 26-189 Framework

May 26, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP