March 22, 2013
Authored and Edited by Elizabeth D. Ferrill
The 2013 Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas had 3,300 exhibitors displaying an estimated 20,000 new products. Many will not be for sale for many months, but were previewed at the CES for public consumption. Harvard Business Review reports that successful product launches require entrepreneurs to perform market research and independent testing and to educate sales channels and consumers. A recent article in Inc. Magazine agrees.
Trade shows, market research, and consumer education all have one thing in common: public disclosure of the product design at issue. But, long gone are the days when a company could “preview” its product design at an annual meeting or trade show, tweak the design, launch its product months later, and still rely on the one-year grace period of 35 U.S.C. 102(b) to file design patent applications to protect its innovative work.
Under the “first-inventor-to-file” regime of the America Invents Act, effective March 16, 2013, public disclosure of a complete product design without filing for a design patent protection beforehand may be giving that design away to competitors. While the AIA includes a limited grace period for certain disclosures, this grace period is a far cry from the pre-AIA one-year period that permitted public use or sale of a design prior to filing a patent application.
Under these new rules it seems likely that many more products at CES 2014 will be patent pending…that is design patent pending.
Copyright © 2013 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. Additional disclaimer information.
Articles
California Reaches Record $12.75 Million CCPA Settlement with General Motors Over Driver Data
June 4, 2026
At the PTAB Blog
Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a
§ 325(d) EPR Denial
May 28, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.